» Articles » PMID: 17360369

First-spike Latency Information in Single Neurons Increases when Referenced to Population Onset

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17360369
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well known that many stimulus parameters, such as sound location in the auditory system or contrast in the visual system, can modulate the timing of the first spike in sensory neurons. Could first-spike latency be a candidate neural code? Most studies measuring first-spike latency information assume that the brain has an independent reference for stimulus onset from which to extract latency. This assumption creates an obvious confound that casts doubt on the feasibility of first-spike latency codes. If latency is measured relative to an internal reference of stimulus onset calculated from the responses of the neural population, the information conveyed by the latency of single neurons might decrease because of correlated changes in latency across the population. Here we assess the effects of a realistic model of stimulus onset detection on the first-spike latency information conveyed by single neurons in the auditory system. Contrary to expectation, we find that on average, the information contained in single neurons does not decrease; in fact, the majority of neurons show a slight increase in the information conveyed by latency referenced to a population onset. Our results show that first-spike latency codes are a feasible mechanism for information transfer even when biologically plausible estimates of stimulus onset are taken into account.

Citing Articles

Noncanonical Short-Latency Auditory Pathway Directly Activates Deep Cortical Layers.

Garcia M, Kline A, Onodera K, Tsukano H, Dandu P, Acosta H bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829930 PMC: 11741258. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.06.631598.


A new function of offset response in the primate auditory cortex: marker of temporal integration.

Song P, Xu H, Ye H, Du X, Zhai Y, Bao X Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1350.

PMID: 39424927 PMC: 11489726. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07058-9.


Eric Daniel Young.

Manis P J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(6):527-530.

PMID: 39378004 PMC: 11683030. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00964-z.


Dissociated Representation of Binaural Cues in Single-Sided Deafness: Implications for Cochlear Implantation.

Hubka P, Schmidt L, Tillein J, Baumhoff P, Konerding W, Land R J Neurosci. 2024; 44(28.

PMID: 38830759 PMC: 11236580. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1653-23.2024.


Single-unit data for sensory neuroscience: Responses from the auditory nerve of young-adult and aging gerbils.

Heeringa A Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):411.

PMID: 38649691 PMC: 11035566. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03259-3.


References
1.
Van Gisbergen J, Grashuis J, Johannesma P, Vendrik A . Statistical analysis and interpretation of the initial response of cochlear nucleus neurons to tone bursts. Exp Brain Res. 1975; 23(4):407-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00238023. View

2.
Moller A . Latency of unit responses in cochlear nucleus determined in two different ways. J Neurophysiol. 1975; 38(4):812-21. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.812. View

3.
Kuwada S, Yin T, Syka J, Buunen T, Wickesberg R . Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. IV. Comparison of monaural and binaural response properties. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 51(6):1306-25. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1306. View

4.
Wightman F, Kistler D . Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989; 85(2):858-67. DOI: 10.1121/1.397557. View

5.
Smith P, Rhode W . Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1989; 282(4):595-616. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902820410. View