» Articles » PMID: 17350995

Quantifying Robustness and Dissipation Cost of Yeast Cell Cycle Network: the Funneled Energy Landscape Perspectives

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2007 Mar 14
PMID 17350995
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We study the origin of robustness of yeast cell cycle cellular network through uncovering its underlying energy landscape. This is realized from the information of the steady-state probabilities by solving a discrete set of kinetic master equations for the network. We discovered that the potential landscape of yeast cell cycle network is funneled toward the global minimum, G1 state. The ratio of the energy gap between G1 and average versus roughness of the landscape termed as robustness ratio (RR) becomes a quantitative measure of the robustness and stability for the network. The funneled landscape is quite robust against random perturbations from the inherent wiring or connections of the network. There exists a global phase transition between the more sensitive response or less self-degradation phase leading to underlying funneled global landscape with large RR, and insensitive response or more self-degradation phase leading to shallower underlying landscape of the network with small RR. Furthermore, we show that the more robust landscape also leads to less dissipation cost of the network. Least dissipation and robust landscape might be a realization of Darwinian principle of natural selection at cellular network level. It may provide an optimal criterion for network wiring connections and design.

Citing Articles

Quantifying nonequilibrium dynamics and thermodynamics of cell fate decision making in yeast under pheromone induction.

Li S, Liu Q, Wang E, Wang J Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 4(3):031401.

PMID: 38510708 PMC: 10903495. DOI: 10.1063/5.0157759.


Navigating Multi-Scale Cancer Systems Biology Towards Model-Driven Clinical Oncology and Its Applications in Personalized Therapeutics.

Gondal M, Chaudhary S Front Oncol. 2021; 11:712505.

PMID: 34900668 PMC: 8652070. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.712505.


Perspectives on the landscape and flux theory for describing emergent behaviors of the biological systems.

Wang J J Biol Phys. 2021; 48(1):1-36.

PMID: 34822073 PMC: 8866630. DOI: 10.1007/s10867-021-09586-5.


Reverse engineering directed gene regulatory networks from transcriptomics and proteomics data of biomining bacterial communities with approximate Bayesian computation and steady-state signalling simulations.

Buetti-Dinh A, Herold M, Christel S, Hajjami M, Delogu F, Ilie O BMC Bioinformatics. 2020; 21(1):23.

PMID: 31964336 PMC: 6975020. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3337-9.


Determining Relative Dynamic Stability of Cell States Using Boolean Network Model.

Joo J, Zhou J, Huang S, Cho K Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12077.

PMID: 30104572 PMC: 6089891. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30544-0.


References
1.
Elowitz M, Leibler S . A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000; 403(6767):335-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002125. View

2.
Zhu X, Yin L, Hood L, Ao P . Calculating biological behaviors of epigenetic states in the phage lambda life cycle. Funct Integr Genomics. 2004; 4(3):188-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10142-003-0095-5. View

3.
Tyson J . Modeling the cell division cycle: cdc2 and cyclin interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(16):7328-32. PMC: 52288. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7328. View

4.
Novak B, Tyson J . Modeling the control of DNA replication in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(17):9147-52. PMC: 23080. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9147. View

5.
Barabasi A, Bonabeau E . Scale-free networks. Sci Am. 2003; 288(5):60-9. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60. View