» Articles » PMID: 17334799

Medial Forebrain Bundle Stimulation Evokes Endocannabinoid-mediated Modulation of Ventral Tegmental Area Dopamine Neuron Firing in Vivo

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2007 Mar 6
PMID 17334799
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Endocannabinoid-mediated forms of transient synaptic depression have been described in several brain structures, including the dopaminergic ventral tegmental area (VTA). However, their functional and/or behavioural correlates are yet to be determined.

Objectives: The present study was designed to investigate whether back-propagating action potentials in dopamine (DA) neurons, evoked by the stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), could trigger endocannabinoid-mediated forms of synaptic modulation. The MFB contains axons ascending from DA neurons to the nucleus accumbens and other forebrain structures, and its stimulation is rewarding because it elicits intra-cranial self-stimulation.

Materials And Methods: Single cell extracellular recordings were carried out from anti-dromically identified VTA DA neurons in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats.

Results: DA neurons responded to MFB stimulation (1 s, 20-80 Hz) with a frequency-dependent increase in spontaneous firing rate, which was enhanced by the cannabinoid type-1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (1 mg/kg) and depressed by the agonist WIN55212-2 (0.125 mg/kg). Increasing brain levels of the endocannabinoid anandamide by blocking its major hydrolysing enzyme, fatty-acid amide hydrolase, with URB597 (0.1 mg/kg) was ineffective, whereas blockade of the endocannabinoid membrane transporter with UCM707 (1 mg/kg) enhanced post-stimulus firing rate.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that stimulation of the MFB evokes an endocannabinoid-mediated short-term modulation of DA neuron activity. Thus, endocannabinoids might play an important role in the mechanisms underlying the rewarding properties of MFB stimulation.

Citing Articles

Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors Are Expressed in a Subset of Dopamine Neurons and Underlie Cannabinoid-Induced Aversion, Hypoactivity, and Anxiolytic Effects in Mice.

Han X, Liang Y, Hempel B, Jordan C, Shen H, Bi G J Neurosci. 2022; 43(3):373-385.

PMID: 36517243 PMC: 9864584. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-22.2022.


Neutral CB1 Receptor Antagonists as Pharmacotherapies for Substance Use Disorders: Rationale, Evidence, and Challenge.

Soler-Cedeno O, Xi Z Cells. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36291128 PMC: 9600259. DOI: 10.3390/cells11203262.


Bi-directional modulation of food habit expression by the endocannabinoid system.

Gianessi C, Groman S, Taylor J Eur J Neurosci. 2018; 49(12):1610-1622.

PMID: 30589475 PMC: 7790508. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14330.


Ventral tegmental area dopamine and GABA neurons: Physiological properties and expression of mRNA for endocannabinoid biosynthetic elements.

Merrill C, Friend L, Newton S, Hopkins Z, Edwards J Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16176.

PMID: 26553597 PMC: 4639757. DOI: 10.1038/srep16176.


Endocannabinoids and striatal function: implications for addiction-related behaviours.

Moreira F, Jupp B, Belin D, Dalley J Behav Pharmacol. 2014; 26(1-2):59-72.

PMID: 25369747 PMC: 5398317. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000109.


References
1.
Maldonado R, Valverde O, Berrendero F . Involvement of the endocannabinoid system in drug addiction. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29(4):225-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.01.008. View

2.
Bielajew C, Shizgal P . Evidence implicating descending fibers in self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. J Neurosci. 1986; 6(4):919-29. PMC: 6568435. View

3.
Freund T, Katona I, Piomelli D . Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83(3):1017-66. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2003. View

4.
Gallistel C, Shizgal P, Yeomans J . A portrait of the substrate for self-stimulation. Psychol Rev. 1981; 88(3):228-73. View

5.
You Z, Chen Y, Wise R . Dopamine and glutamate release in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation. Neuroscience. 2001; 107(4):629-39. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00379-7. View