» Articles » PMID: 17323150

Influence of Porosity and Fibre Diameter on the Degradation of Chitosan Fibre-mesh Scaffolds and Cell Adhesion

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Feb 27
PMID 17323150
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The state of the art approaches for tailoring the degradation of chitosan scaffolds are based on altering the chemical structure of the polymer. Nevertheless, such alterations may lead to changes in other properties of scaffolds, such as the ability to promote cell adhesion. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of physical parameters such as porosity and fibre diameter on the degradation of chitosan fibre-mesh scaffolds, as a possible way of tailoring the degradation of such scaffolds. Four sets of scaffolds with distinct fibre diameter and porosity were produced and their response to degradation and cell adhesion was studied. The degradation study was carried out at 37degrees C in a lysozyme solution for five weeks. The extent of degradation was expressed as percentage of weight loss of the dried scaffolds after lysozyme treatment. Cell adhesion was assessed by Confocal Microscopy. The results have shown that the scaffolds with higher porosity degrade faster and that, within the same range of porosity, the fibres with smaller diameter degrade slightly faster. Furthermore, the morphological differences between the scaffolds did not affect the degree of cell adhesion, and the cells were observed throughout the thickness of all four types of scaffolds.

Citing Articles

The effectiveness of chitosan as a hemostatic in dentistry in patients with antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Minervini G, Franco R, Marrapodi M, Di Blasio M, Cicciu M, Ronsivalle V BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):70.

PMID: 38200485 PMC: 10782677. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03568-w.


Bio-fabrication of stem-cell-incorporated corneal epithelial and stromal equivalents from silk fibroin and gelatin-based biomaterial for canine corneal regeneration.

Torsahakul C, Israsena N, Khramchantuk S, Ratanavaraporn J, Dhitavat S, Rodprasert W PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263141.

PMID: 35120168 PMC: 8815981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263141.


Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Cementitious Cellular Composites Incorporating Micro-Encapsulated Phase Change Material.

Wu Z, Xu Y, Savija B Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(24).

PMID: 34947180 PMC: 8704620. DOI: 10.3390/ma14247586.


Chitosan-Urea Nanocomposite for Improved Fertilizer Applications: The Effect on the Soil Enzymatic Activities and Microflora Dynamics in N Cycle of Potatoes ( L.).

Kondal R, Kalia A, Krejcar O, Kuca K, Sharma S, Luthra K Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(17).

PMID: 34502927 PMC: 8433729. DOI: 10.3390/polym13172887.


Crab vs. Mushroom: A Review of Crustacean and Fungal Chitin in Wound Treatment.

Jones M, Kujundzic M, John S, Bismarck A Mar Drugs. 2020; 18(1).

PMID: 31963764 PMC: 7024172. DOI: 10.3390/md18010064.


References
1.
Gopferich A . Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials. 1996; 17(2):103-14. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85755-3. View

2.
Di Martino A, Sittinger M, Risbud M . Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(30):5983-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.016. View

3.
Varum K, Myhr M, Hjerde R, Smidsrod O . In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum. Carbohydr Res. 1997; 299(1-2):99-101. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6215(96)00332-1. View

4.
Langer R, Vacanti J . Tissue engineering. Science. 1993; 260(5110):920-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.8493529. View

5.
Dhiman H, Ray A, Panda A . Characterization and evaluation of chitosan matrix for in vitro growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(21):5147-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.025. View