» Articles » PMID: 17296935

Multiscale Responses of Microbial Life to Spatial Distance and Environmental Heterogeneity in a Patchy Ecosystem

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Feb 14
PMID 17296935
Citations 142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spatial distance (SD) and environmental heterogeneity (EH) are currently thought to represent major factors shaping genetic variation and population abundance, but their relative importance is still poorly understood. Because EH varies at multiple spatial scales, so too are microbial variables expected to vary. The determination of SD x EH interactions at multiple scales is, however, not a trivial exercise, especially when one examines their effects on microbial abundance and genomic similarities. Here we assessed those interactions at all scales perceptible in a patchy environment composed of known plant species and of heterogeneous soil physical and chemical parameters. For free-living, soil-borne Burkholderia ambifaria, genomic similarities responded to most of the spatial scales that the experimental sampling scheme could reveal, despite limited dispersal of the individuals. Species abundance and community composition were, however, responding to much smaller scales more consistent with local responses to EH. Our results suggest that whole-genome similarities may reflect the simultaneous effects of both SD and EH in microbial populations, but the pure effects of each factor only contributed to < 2% of the total genetic variation. The large amount of unexplained variation that remains after considering most environmental, spatial, and biological interactions is then posited to be the result of noise introduced by unmeasured environmental and spatial variability, sampling effects, and neutral ecological drift.

Citing Articles

Habitat specificity modulates the bacterial biogeographic patterns in the Southern Ocean.

Delleuze M, Schwob G, Orlando J, Gerard K, Saucede T, Brickle P FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(11).

PMID: 39363207 PMC: 11523047. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae134.


Epiphytic bacterial community composition on four submerged macrophytes in different regions of Taihu Lake.

Fang H, Zhen Z, Yang F, Su H, Wei Y Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1404718.

PMID: 39119501 PMC: 11306141. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1404718.


Initial microbiome and tree root status structured the soil microbial community discrepancy of the subtropical pine-oak forest in a large urban forest park.

Tian K, Chen S, Ye R, Xie Y, Yao L, Lin H Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1391863.

PMID: 38881652 PMC: 11176443. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1391863.


Spatial variations impact the soil fungal communities of forests in Northeast China.

Zhao W, Huang K, Mumin R, Li J, Sun Y, Cui B Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1408272.

PMID: 38855467 PMC: 11157130. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1408272.


Ranking environmental and edaphic attributes driving soil microbial community structure and activity with special attention to spatial and temporal scales.

Gupta V, Tiedje J mLife. 2024; 3(1):21-41.

PMID: 38827504 PMC: 11139212. DOI: 10.1002/mlf2.12116.


References
1.
Cho J, Tiedje J . Biogeography and degree of endemicity of fluorescent Pseudomonas strains in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(12):5448-56. PMC: 92480. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5448-5456.2000. View

2.
Parke J . Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001; 39:225-58. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.225. View

3.
Miller S, LiPuma J, Parke J . Culture-based and non-growth-dependent detection of the Burkholderia cepacia complex in soil environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(8):3750-8. PMC: 124052. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3750-3758.2002. View

4.
Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M . Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science. 2003; 299(5604):241-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1078037. View

5.
Papke R, Ramsing N, Bateson M, Ward D . Geographical isolation in hot spring cyanobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2003; 5(8):650-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00460.x. View