» Articles » PMID: 17250769

Gene Network Interconnectedness and the Generalized Topological Overlap Measure

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Jan 26
PMID 17250769
Citations 344
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Network methods are increasingly used to represent the interactions of genes and/or proteins. Genes or proteins that are directly linked may have a similar biological function or may be part of the same biological pathway. Since the information on the connection (adjacency) between 2 nodes may be noisy or incomplete, it can be desirable to consider alternative measures of pairwise interconnectedness. Here we study a class of measures that are proportional to the number of neighbors that a pair of nodes share in common. For example, the topological overlap measure by Ravasz et al. 1 can be interpreted as a measure of agreement between the m = 1 step neighborhoods of 2 nodes. Several studies have shown that two proteins having a higher topological overlap are more likely to belong to the same functional class than proteins having a lower topological overlap. Here we address the question whether a measure of topological overlap based on higher-order neighborhoods could give rise to a more robust and sensitive measure of interconnectedness.

Results: We generalize the topological overlap measure from m = 1 step neighborhoods to m > or = 2 step neighborhoods. This allows us to define the m-th order generalized topological overlap measure (GTOM) by (i) counting the number of m-step neighbors that a pair of nodes share and (ii) normalizing it to take a value between 0 and 1. Using theoretical arguments, a yeast co-expression network application, and a fly protein network application, we illustrate the usefulness of the proposed measure for module detection and gene neighborhood analysis.

Conclusion: Topological overlap can serve as an important filter to counter the effects of spurious or missing connections between network nodes. The m-th order topological overlap measure allows one to trade-off sensitivity versus specificity when it comes to defining pairwise interconnectedness and network modules.

Citing Articles

Dynamic molecular regulation of salt stress responses in maize ( L.) seedlings.

Maimaiti A, Gu W, Yu D, Guan Y, Qu J, Qin T Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1535943.

PMID: 40070712 PMC: 11893837. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1535943.


Circulating microRNA panels for multi-cancer detection and gastric cancer screening: leveraging a network biology approach.

Kamkar L, Saberi S, Totonchi M, Kavousi K BMC Med Genomics. 2025; 18(1):27.

PMID: 39915853 PMC: 11804061. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-025-02091-x.


Analysis of key lncRNA related to Parkinson's disease based on gene co-expression weight networks.

Liang W, Zhao W, Li B, Luo J, Li X, Jia W Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025; 30(1):20-29.

PMID: 39800420 PMC: 11753585. DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2025.1.20230112.


Enhancing chemotherapy response prediction via matched colorectal tumor-organoid gene expression analysis and network-based biomarker selection.

Zhang W, Wu C, Huang H, Bleu P, Zambare W, Alvarez J Transl Oncol. 2025; 52():102238.

PMID: 39754813 PMC: 11754497. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102238.


Connectome-based prediction of functional impairment in experimental stroke models.

Schmitt O, Eipert P, Wang Y, Kanoke A, Rabiller G, Liu J PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0310743.

PMID: 39700116 PMC: 11658581. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310743.


References
1.
Isaacs F, Hasty J, Cantor C, Collins J . Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(13):7714-9. PMC: 164653. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1332628100. View

2.
Ghazalpour A, Doss S, Zhang B, Wang S, Plaisier C, Castellanos R . Integrating genetic and network analysis to characterize genes related to mouse weight. PLoS Genet. 2006; 2(8):e130. PMC: 1550283. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020130. View

3.
Oldham M, Horvath S, Geschwind D . Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(47):17973-8. PMC: 1693857. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605938103. View

4.
Stark C, Breitkreutz B, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M . BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 34(Database issue):D535-9. PMC: 1347471. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj109. View

5.
Prinz S, Avila-Campillo I, Aldridge C, Srinivasan A, Dimitrov K, Siegel A . Control of yeast filamentous-form growth by modules in an integrated molecular network. Genome Res. 2004; 14(3):380-90. PMC: 353223. DOI: 10.1101/gr.2020604. View