Structure, Topology, and Tilt of Cell-signaling Peptides Containing Nuclear Localization Sequences in Membrane Bilayers Determined by Solid-state NMR and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies

Overview

Journal Biochemistry

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2007 Jan 24

PMID 17240980

Citations 33

Authors

Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy

Senthil K Kandasamy

Dong-Kuk Lee

Srikanth Kidambi

Ronald G Larson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cell-signaling peptides have been extensively used to transport functional molecules across the plasma membrane into living cells. These peptides consist of a hydrophobic sequence and a cationic nuclear localization sequence (NLS). It has been assumed that the hydrophobic region penetrates the hydrophobic lipid bilayer and delivers the NLS inside the cell. To better understand the transport mechanism of these peptides, in this study, we investigated the structure, orientation, tilt of the peptide relative to the bilayer normal, and the membrane interaction of two cell-signaling peptides, SA and SKP. Results from CD and solid-state NMR experiments combined with molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the hydrophobic region is helical and has a transmembrane orientation with the helical axis tilted away from the bilayer normal. The influence of the hydrophobic mismatch, between the hydrophobic length of the peptide and the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer, on the tilt angle of the peptides was investigated using thicker POPC and thinner DMPC bilayers. NMR experiments showed that the hydrophobic domain of each peptide has a tilt angle of 15 +/- 3 degrees in POPC, whereas in DMPC, 25 +/- 3 degree and 30 +/- 3 degree tilts were observed for SA and SKP peptides, respectively. These results are in good agreement with molecular dynamics simulations, which predict a tilt angle of 13.3 degrees (SA in POPC), 16.4 degrees (SKP in POPC), 22.3 degrees (SA in DMPC), and 31.7 degrees (SKP in DMPC). These results and simulations on the hydrophobic fragment of SA or SKP suggest that the tilt of helices increases with a decrease in bilayer thickness without changing the phase, order, and structure of the lipid bilayers.

Citing Articles

Breaking the Backbone: Central Arginine Residues Induce Membrane Exit and Helix Distortions within a Dynamic Membrane Peptide.

McKay M, Fu R, Greathouse D, Koeppe 2nd R J Phys Chem B. 2019; 123(38):8034-8047.

PMID: 31483653 PMC: 6765365. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b06034.

Structure of the transmembrane domain of human nicastrin-a component of γ-secretase.

Li Y, Liew L, Li Q, Kang C Sci Rep. 2016; 6:19522.

PMID: 26776682 PMC: 4726005. DOI: 10.1038/srep19522.

Hydrophobic mismatch demonstrated for membranolytic peptides, and their use as molecular rulers to measure bilayer thickness in native cells.

Grau-Campistany A, Strandberg E, Wadhwani P, Reichert J, Burck J, Rabanal F Sci Rep. 2015; 5:9388.

PMID: 25807192 PMC: 5224518. DOI: 10.1038/srep09388.

Effects of truncating van der Waals interactions in lipid bilayer simulations.

Huang K, Garcia A J Chem Phys. 2014; 141(10):105101.

PMID: 25217953 PMC: 4162907. DOI: 10.1063/1.4893965.

Cell-permeable parkin proteins suppress Parkinson disease-associated phenotypes in cultured cells and animals.

Duong T, Kim J, Ruley H, Jo D PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102517.

PMID: 25019626 PMC: 4097392. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102517.

References

Hawiger J . Noninvasive intracellular delivery of functional peptides and proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1999; 3(1):89-94. DOI: 10.1016/s1367-5931(99)80016-7. View

Thompson L . Solid-state NMR studies of the structure and mechanisms of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002; 12(5):661-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00374-3. View

Tieleman D, Berendsen H, Sansom M . Surface binding of alamethicin stabilizes its helical structure: molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 1999; 76(6):3186-91. PMC: 1300287. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77470-9. View

Berger O, Edholm O, Jahnig F . Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. Biophys J. 1997; 72(5):2002-13. PMC: 1184396. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78845-3. View

Opella S, Marassi F . Structure determination of membrane proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Chem Rev. 2004; 104(8):3587-606. PMC: 3270942. DOI: 10.1021/cr0304121. View

Andronesi O, Becker S, Seidel K, Heise H, Young H, Baldus M . Determination of membrane protein structure and dynamics by magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(37):12965-74. DOI: 10.1021/ja0530164. View

Sharpe S, Yau W, Tycko R . Structure and dynamics of the HIV-1 Vpu transmembrane domain revealed by solid-state NMR with magic-angle spinning. Biochemistry. 2006; 45(3):918-33. DOI: 10.1021/bi051766k. View

Todokoro Y, Yumen I, Fukushima K, Kang S, Park J, Kohno T . Structure of tightly membrane-bound mastoparan-X, a G-protein-activating peptide, determined by solid-state NMR. Biophys J. 2006; 91(4):1368-79. PMC: 1518647. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082735. View

Zorko M, Langel U . Cell-penetrating peptides: mechanism and kinetics of cargo delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005; 57(4):529-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.010. View

10.

Wang J, Denny J, Tian C, Kim S, Mo Y, Kovacs F . Imaging membrane protein helical wheels. J Magn Reson. 2000; 144(1):162-7. DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2037. View

11.

Kandasamy S, Larson R . Molecular dynamics simulations of model trans-membrane peptides in lipid bilayers: a systematic investigation of hydrophobic mismatch. Biophys J. 2006; 90(7):2326-43. PMC: 1403172. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.073395. View

12.

Thoren P, Persson D, Esbjorner E, Goksor M, Lincoln P, Norden B . Membrane binding and translocation of cell-penetrating peptides. Biochemistry. 2004; 43(12):3471-89. DOI: 10.1021/bi0360049. View

13.

Killian J, Nyholm T . Peptides in lipid bilayers: the power of simple models. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006; 16(4):473-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.06.007. View

14.

Veach R, Liu D, Yao S, Chen Y, Liu X, Downs S . Receptor/transporter-independent targeting of functional peptides across the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2003; 279(12):11425-31. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M311089200. View

15.

Harzer U, Bechinger B . Alignment of lysine-anchored membrane peptides under conditions of hydrophobic mismatch: a CD, 15N and 31P solid-state NMR spectroscopy investigation. Biochemistry. 2000; 39(43):13106-14. DOI: 10.1021/bi000770n. View

16.

Marassi F . A simple approach to membrane protein secondary structure and topology based on NMR spectroscopy. Biophys J. 2001; 80(2):994-1003. PMC: 1301297. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76078-X. View

17.

Guex N, Peitsch M . SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1998; 18(15):2714-23. DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150181505. View

18.

Kandasamy S, Larson R . Binding and insertion of alpha-helical anti-microbial peptides in POPC bilayers studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Phys Lipids. 2004; 132(1):113-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.09.011. View

19.

Yang J, Parkanzky P, Bodner M, Duskin C, Weliky D . Application of REDOR subtraction for filtered MAS observation of labeled backbone carbons of membrane-bound fusion peptides. J Magn Reson. 2002; 159(2):101-10. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00033-2. View

20.

de Planque M, Greathouse D, Koeppe 2nd R, Schafer H, Marsh D, Killian J . Influence of lipid/peptide hydrophobic mismatch on the thickness of diacylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. A 2H NMR and ESR study using designed transmembrane alpha-helical peptides and gramicidin A. Biochemistry. 1998; 37(26):9333-45. DOI: 10.1021/bi980233r. View