» Articles » PMID: 17234068

Foot Rotational Effects on Radiographic Measures of Lower Limb Alignment

Overview
Journal Can J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2007 Jan 20
PMID 17234068
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Surgical planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) typically requires the measurement of lower limb alignment from standing anteroposterior radiographs. Although every effort is made to maintain a standardized patient position, factors such as pain or anatomic constraints may necessitate acquiring the radiograph in a less than optimal patient position. One such constraint is natural rotation of the feet with respect to the tibia. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the magnitude of the effect of foot rotation on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment.

Methods: We analyzed 19 lower limbs from radiographs obtained from 10 people who reported to an orthopedic injuries clinic. Each patient was radiographed in 3 positions: 15 degrees of internal foot rotation, no foot rotation and 15 degrees of external foot rotation. We measured and compared the mechanical axis angle (hip-knee-ankle) and the mechanical axis deviation from each position.

Results: Compared with the position with no foot rotation, internal foot rotation resulted in less measured varus alignment and less mechanical axis deviation from the knee joint centre, whereas external foot rotation produced greater measured varus alignment and increased mechanical axis deviation from the knee joint centre.

Conclusions: These results indicate that patient positioning is an important factor when measuring lower limb alignment from radiographs. As a result, special care must be taken when acquiring these radiographs for use in planning surgical procedures such as HTO.

Citing Articles

Peak knee joint moments accurately predict medial and lateral knee contact forces in patients with valgus malalignment.

Holder J, van Drongelen S, Uhlrich S, Herrmann E, Meurer A, Stief F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2870.

PMID: 36806297 PMC: 9938879. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30058-4.


Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis of pediatric lower limb parameters on digital long leg radiographs.

Braun S, Brenneis M, Holder J, Meurer A, Stief F J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):69.

PMID: 36707864 PMC: 9881281. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03552-8.


The Effect of Position on Radiographic Angle Measurements of the Lower Extremities.

Chung J, Lee J, Han H, Lee M, Ro D Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:1057227.

PMID: 35295959 PMC: 8920670. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1057227.


Improving postoperative radiographs for the parameter measurement of hexapod external fixator using an additional foot ring.

Liu Y, Liu K, Cai F, Zhang T, Yusufu A J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):668.

PMID: 34774063 PMC: 8590332. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02820-9.


Influence of axial limb rotation on radiographic lower limb alignment: a systematic review.

Ahrend M, Baumgartner H, Ihle C, Histing T, Schroter S, Finger F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(11):3349-3366.

PMID: 34596760 PMC: 9522705. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04163-w.


References
1.
Dugdale T, Noyes F, Styer D . Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (274):248-64. View

2.
Berman A, Bosacco S, Kirshner S, Avolio Jr A . Factors influencing long-term results in high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (272):192-8. View

3.
Guccione A, Felson D, Anderson J, Anthony J, Zhang Y, Wilson P . The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(3):351-8. PMC: 1614827. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.3.351. View

4.
Tetsworth K, Paley D . Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994; 25(3):367-77. View

5.
McKellop H, Llinas A, Sarmiento A . Effects of tibial malalignment on the knee and ankle. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994; 25(3):415-23. View