Comparison of Cobb Angle Measurement of Scoliosis Radiographs with Preselected End Vertebrae: Traditional Versus Digital Acquisition
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Design: Prospective study.
Objective: To compare variability in Cobb angle between digitally and traditionally acquired scoliosis radiographs.
Summary Of Background Data: Previous studies have shown that the 95% confidence interval for Cobb angle can vary from 2.6 degrees to 8.8 degrees. No study directly comparing Cobb angles measured from traditional and digitally acquired radiographs has been reported.
Methods: A spine model simulating 25 single right thoracic curves (range, 20 degrees-60 degrees) was imaged using traditional and digital techniques. Traditional films and miniaturized printed digital films were each measured twice manually. Digital films were also measured twice using computer imaging software.
Results: Overall mean angle and (95% confidence interval) were 41.7 degrees (39.1 degrees-44.3 degrees) for traditional, 40.6 degrees (37.4 degrees-43.8 degrees) for digital, and 39.7 degrees (36.3 degrees-43.1 degrees) for computer measurements. Overall correlation was 0.994 for traditional and digital, 0.987 for traditional and computer, and 0.993 for digital and computer. Fixed effect model analysis demonstrated that, although a statistically significant difference existed between the 3 methods of measuring the Cobb angle (P < 0.0001), the difference between methods was less than 2 degrees.
Conclusions: Any of the 3 evaluated methods of measurement can be used to measure Cobb angles. Additionally, the methods can be used interchangeably.
Kwan C, Young J, Lai J, Lai K, Yang K, Hung A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):222.
PMID: 40045341 PMC: 11881507. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08467-5.
Li H, Qian C, Yan W, Fu D, Zheng Y, Zhang Z J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50631.
PMID: 39486021 PMC: 11568394. DOI: 10.2196/50631.
Hurtado-Aviles J, Leon-Munoz V, Santonja-Medina F, Raimondi P, Martinez-Martinez F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).
PMID: 39124828 PMC: 11313236. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154562.
Braun S, Brenneis M, Holder J, Meurer A, Stief F J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):69.
PMID: 36707864 PMC: 9881281. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03552-8.
Predicting curve progression for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using random forest model.
Alfraihat A, Samdani A, Balasubramanian S PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273002.
PMID: 35951527 PMC: 9371275. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273002.