» Articles » PMID: 17188898

Enhanced Detection of Artifacts in EEG Data Using Higher-order Statistics and Independent Component Analysis

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Dec 26
PMID 17188898
Citations 466
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Detecting artifacts produced in EEG data by muscle activity, eye blinks and electrical noise is a common and important problem in EEG research. It is now widely accepted that independent component analysis (ICA) may be a useful tool for isolating artifacts and/or cortical processes from electroencephalographic (EEG) data. We present results of simulations demonstrating that ICA decomposition, here tested using three popular ICA algorithms, Infomax, SOBI, and FastICA, can allow more sensitive automated detection of small non-brain artifacts than applying the same detection methods directly to the scalp channel data. We tested the upper bound performance of five methods for detecting various types of artifacts by separately optimizing and then applying them to artifact-free EEG data into which we had added simulated artifacts of several types, ranging in size from thirty times smaller (-50 dB) to the size of the EEG data themselves (0 dB). Of the methods tested, those involving spectral thresholding were most sensitive. Except for muscle artifact detection where we found no gain of using ICA, all methods proved more sensitive when applied to the ICA-decomposed data than applied to the raw scalp data: the mean performance for ICA was higher and situated at about two standard deviations away from the performance distribution obtained on raw data. We note that ICA decomposition also allows simple subtraction of artifacts accounted for by single independent components, and/or separate and direct examination of the decomposed non-artifact processes themselves.

Citing Articles

Cognitive Performance in Relation to Systemic and Brain Iron at Perimenopause.

Barnett A, Wenger M, Miles P, Wu D, Isingizwe Z, Benbrook D Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077615 PMC: 11901746. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050745.


Resilience and vulnerability of neural speech tracking after hearing restoration.

Federici A, Fantoni M, Pavani F, Handjaras G, Bednaya E, Martinelli A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):343.

PMID: 40025189 PMC: 11873316. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07788-4.


Neurophysiological Markers of Adaptation and Compensation Following Lower Limb Amputation: An Analysis of EEG Oscillations and Clinical Predictors from the DEFINE Cohort Study.

Lacerda G, Costa V, Camargo L, Battistella L, Imamura M, Fregni F Neurol Int. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39997652 PMC: 11858193. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint17020021.


How does Independent Component Analysis Preprocessing Affect EEG Microstates?.

Artoni F, Michel C Brain Topogr. 2025; 38(2):26.

PMID: 39904902 PMC: 11794336. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01098-4.


Neuronal oscillations and functional connectivity of paced nostril breathing: A high-density EEG study.

Frohlich A, Frohlich F, Sklerov M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316125.

PMID: 39899491 PMC: 11790152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316125.


References
1.
Urrestarazu E, Iriarte J, Alegre M, Valencia M, Viteri C, Artieda J . Independent component analysis removing artifacts in ictal recordings. Epilepsia. 2004; 45(9):1071-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.12104.x. View

2.
Bell A, Sejnowski T . An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995; 7(6):1129-59. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129. View

3.
Jung T, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee T, McKeown M, Iragui V . Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):163-78. View

4.
Makeig S, Jung T, Bell A, Ghahremani D, Sejnowski T . Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(20):10979-84. PMC: 23551. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10979. View

5.
James C, Gibson O . Temporally constrained ICA: an application to artifact rejection in electromagnetic brain signal analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003; 50(9):1108-16. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.816076. View