» Articles » PMID: 17151929

Impact of Novel PTEN Mutations in Turkish Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Dec 8
PMID 17151929
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents the most common and aggressive type of primary neoplasms of the central nervous system. The PTEN (phosphatase, tensin homologue, deleted on chromosome TEN; MIM # 601728) tumor suppressor gene has an essential biological role in the formation of glioblastomas. It is known that there are variations in genetic alterations in tumors that develop in patients with different ethnic backgrounds and because there is no study evaluating PTEN mutation in Turkish patients with GBM, we aimed to realize the present study. We investigated 62 GBM tumors for mutations of the PTEN gene using single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) method followed by DNA sequencing. As a result of our investigation, PTEN mutations were detected in 15 of 62 tumors (24.19%). Nine different sequence variants were identified: one novel promoter site mutation (5'UTR -9C-->T), one novel intronic mutation (IVS2-2delA), four novel point mutations (61A-->G, 105T-->G, 248C-->G, and 364C-->G), two novel frameshift mutations (213delC) and 378delGATA) and one previously reported global exonic transition type mutation (129G-->A). Since the majority of PTEN mutations identified in the present study are novel, we believe that these alterations may be specific to Turkish population. Furthermore, though no significant correlation was found between PTEN mutations and histopathological properties of GBM tumors, our findings indicate that localizations of mutations in PTEN gene may have an effect on clinical aggressiveness of GBM tumors.

Citing Articles

Structural mutation analysis of PTEN and its genotype-phenotype correlations in endometriosis and cancer.

Smith I, Briggs J Proteins. 2016; 84(11):1625-1643.

PMID: 27481051 PMC: 5073044. DOI: 10.1002/prot.25105.


Glioblastoma multiforme outcomes of 107 patients treated in two Singapore institutions.

Cheo S, Lim G, Lim K Singapore Med J. 2016; 58(1):41-45.

PMID: 26915391 PMC: 5331128. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016044.


A unified nomenclature and amino acid numbering for human PTEN.

Pulido R, Baker S, Barata J, Carracedo A, Cid V, Chin-Sang I Sci Signal. 2014; 7(332):pe15.

PMID: 24985344 PMC: 4367864. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2005560.


The promoter hypermethylation status of GATA6, MGMT, and FHIT in glioblastoma.

Cecener G, Tunca B, Egeli U, Bekar A, Tezcan G, Erturk E Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2011; 32(2):237-44.

PMID: 21928112 PMC: 11498530. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-011-9753-7.


The p85beta regulatory subunit of PI3K serves as a substrate for PTEN protein phosphatase activity during insulin mediated signaling.

He J, de la Monte S, Wands J Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010; 397(3):513-9.

PMID: 20515662 PMC: 2902794. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.146.


References
1.
Georgescu M, Kirsch K, Akagi T, Shishido T, Hanafusa H . The tumor-suppressor activity of PTEN is regulated by its carboxyl-terminal region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(18):10182-7. PMC: 17863. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10182. View

2.
Agrawal S, Pilarski R, Eng C . Different splicing defects lead to differential effects downstream of the lipid and protein phosphatase activities of PTEN. Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14(16):2459-68. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi246. View

3.
Ohgaki H, Kleihues P . Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations in astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005; 64(6):479-89. DOI: 10.1093/jnen/64.6.479. View

4.
Hill C, Hunter S, Brat D . Genetic markers in glioblastoma: prognostic significance and future therapeutic implications. Adv Anat Pathol. 2003; 10(4):212-7. DOI: 10.1097/00125480-200307000-00004. View

5.
Batchelor T, Betensky R, Esposito J, Pham L, Dorfman M, Piscatelli N . Age-dependent prognostic effects of genetic alterations in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(1 Pt 1):228-33. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-0841-3. View