» Articles » PMID: 17148288

Correlated Evolution Between Hearing Sensitivity and Social Calls in Bats

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Dec 7
PMID 17148288
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echolocating bats are auditory specialists, with exquisite hearing that spans several octaves. In the ultrasonic range, bat audiograms typically show highest sensitivity in the spectral region of their species-specific echolocation calls. Well-developed hearing in the audible range has been commonly attributed to a need to detect sounds produced by prey. However, bat pups often emit isolation calls with low-frequency components that facilitate mother-young reunions. In this study, we examine whether low-frequency hearing in bats exhibits correlated evolution with (i) body size; (ii) high-frequency hearing sensitivity or (iii) pup isolation call frequency. Using published audiograms, we found that low-frequency hearing sensitivity is not dependent on body size but is related to high-frequency hearing. After controlling for high-frequency hearing, we found that low-frequency hearing exhibits correlated evolution with isolation call frequency. We infer that detection and discrimination of isolation calls have favoured enhanced low-frequency hearing because accurate parental investment is critical: bats have low reproductive rates, non-volant altricial young and must often identify their pups within large crèches.

Citing Articles

Echolocating bats show species-specific variation in susceptibility to acoustic forward masking.

Capshaw G, Diebold C, Sterbing S, Lauer A, Moss C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(1):511-523.

PMID: 39013168 PMC: 11254387. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026624.


Sows' Responses to Piglets in Distress: An Experimental Investigation in a Natural Setting.

Collarini E, Capponcelli L, Pierdomenico A, Norscia I, Cordoni G Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(14).

PMID: 37508041 PMC: 10376744. DOI: 10.3390/ani13142261.


Adaptive echolocation behavior of bats and toothed whales in dynamic soundscapes.

Moss C, Torres Ortiz S, Wahlberg M J Exp Biol. 2023; 226(9).

PMID: 37161774 PMC: 10184770. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245450.


Auditory sensitivity and vocal acoustics in five species of estrildid songbirds.

Yeh Y, Rivera M, Woolley S Anim Behav. 2022; 195:107-116.

PMID: 36582925 PMC: 9794177. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.11.002.


Cochlear Development; New Tools and Approaches.

Kelley M Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:884240.

PMID: 35813214 PMC: 9260282. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.884240.


References
1.
Wilczynski W, Rand A, Ryan M . Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain Behav Evol. 2002; 58(3):137-51. DOI: 10.1159/000047268. View

2.
Teeling E, Springer M, Madsen O, Bates P, OBrien S, Murphy W . A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science. 2005; 307(5709):580-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1105113. View

3.
Branchi I, Santucci D, Alleva E . Ultrasonic vocalisation emitted by infant rodents: a tool for assessment of neurobehavioural development. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 125(1-2):49-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00277-7. View

4.
Sterbing S, Schmidt U, Rubsamen R . The postnatal development of frequency-place code and tuning characteristics in the auditory midbrain of the phyllostomid bat, Carollia perspicillata. Hear Res. 1994; 76(1-2):133-46. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90095-7. View

5.
Jones K, Purvis A, MacLarnon A, Bininda-Emonds O, Simmons N . A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002; 77(2):223-59. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793101005899. View