» Articles » PMID: 14727133

Auditory Sensitivity and Frequency Selectivity in Greater Spear-nosed Bats Suggest Specializations for Acoustic Communication

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2004 Jan 17
PMID 14727133
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the relationship between auditory sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and the vocal repertoire of greater spear-nosed bats ( Phyllostomus hastatus). P. hastatus commonly emit three types of vocalizations: group-specific foraging calls that range from 6 to 11 kHz, low amplitude echolocation calls that sweep from 80 to 40 kHz, and infant isolation calls from 15 to 100 kHz. To determine if hearing in P. hastatus is differentially sensitive or selective to frequencies in these calls, we determined absolute thresholds and masked thresholds using an operant conditioning procedure. Both absolute and masked thresholds were lowest at 15 kHz, which corresponds with the peak energy of isolation calls. Auditory and masked thresholds were higher at sound frequencies used for group-specific foraging calls and echolocation calls. Isolation calls meet the requirements of individual signatures and facilitate parent-offspring recognition. Many bat species produce isolation calls with peak energy between 10 and 25 kHz, which corresponds with the frequency region of highest sensitivity in those species for which audiogram data are available. These findings suggest that selection for accurate offspring recognition exerts a strong influence on the sensory system of P. hastatus and likely on other species of group-living bats.

Citing Articles

Echolocating Bats Have Evolved Decreased Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Temporary Hearing Losses.

Simmons A, Simmons J J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(3):229-238.

PMID: 38565735 PMC: 11150213. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00941-6.


Noise distracts foraging bats.

Allen L, Hristov N, Rubin J, Lightsey J, Barber J Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1944):20202689.

PMID: 33563124 PMC: 7893219. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2689.


Hearing sensitivity and amplitude coding in bats are differentially shaped by echolocation calls and social calls.

Lattenkamp E, Nagy M, Drexl M, Vernes S, Wiegrebe L, Knornschild M Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1942):20202600.

PMID: 33402076 PMC: 7892409. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2600.


Social structure and relatedness in the fringe-lipped bat ().

Flores V, Carter G, Halczok T, Kerth G, Page R R Soc Open Sci. 2020; 7(4):192256.

PMID: 32431896 PMC: 7211832. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.192256.


Ridge number in bat ears is related to both guild membership and ear length.

Keeley B, Keeley A, Houlahan P PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0200255.

PMID: 30044815 PMC: 6059413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200255.


References
1.
Guppy A, Coles R . Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi. J Comp Physiol A. 1988; 162(5):653-68. DOI: 10.1007/BF01342641. View

2.
Simmons J . The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 54(1):157-73. DOI: 10.1121/1.1913559. View

3.
Esser K . Audio-vocal learning in a non-human mammal: the lesser spear-nosed bat Phyllostomus discolor. Neuroreport. 1994; 5(14):1718-20. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199409080-00007. View

4.
Wilkinson , Wenrick boughman J . Social calls coordinate foraging in greater spear-nosed bats. Anim Behav. 1998; 55(2):337-50. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0557. View

5.
Koay G, Heffner H, Heffner R . Audiogram of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). Hear Res. 1997; 105(1-2):202-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00208-0. View