» Articles » PMID: 17137836

Cervical Spine Manipulation Alters Sensorimotor Integration: a Somatosensory Evoked Potential Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2006 Dec 2
PMID 17137836
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the immediate sensorimotor neurophysiological effects of cervical spine manipulation using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs).

Methods: Twelve subjects with a history of reoccurring neck stiffness and/or neck pain, but no acute symptoms at the time of the study were invited to participate in the study. An additional twelve subjects participated in a passive head movement control experiment. Spinal (N11, N13) brainstem (P14) and cortical (N20, N30) SEPs to median nerve stimulation were recorded before and for 30min after a single session of cervical spine manipulation, or passive head movement.

Results: There was a significant decrease in the amplitude of parietal N20 and frontal N30 SEP components following the single session of cervical spine manipulation compared to pre-manipulation baseline values. These changes lasted on average 20min following the manipulation intervention. No changes were observed in the passive head movement control condition.

Conclusions: Spinal manipulation of dysfunctional cervical joints can lead to transient cortical plastic changes, as demonstrated by attenuation of cortical somatosensory evoked responses.

Significance: This study suggests that cervical spine manipulation may alter cortical somatosensory processing and sensorimotor integration. These findings may help to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the effective relief of pain and restoration of functional ability documented following spinal manipulation treatment.

Citing Articles

Neuromuscular Response to High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Spinal Manipulation-An Overview.

Alanazi M, Degenhardt B, Kelley-Franklin G, Cox J, Lipke L, Reed W Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005304 PMC: 11857552. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020187.


Self-Administered Traction as an Adjunct in the Chiropractic Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.

Muligano D, Serlin A, Sidden T, Cramer G J Chiropr Med. 2025; 23(4):205-214.

PMID: 39776823 PMC: 11701848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.005.


Combined and isolated effects of workstation ergonomics and physiotherapy in improving cervicogenic headache and work ability in office workers: a single-blinded, randomized controlled study.

Nambi G, Alghadier M, Pakkir Mohamed S, Vellaiyan A, Ebrahim E, Sobeh D Front Public Health. 2024; 12():1438591.

PMID: 39697289 PMC: 11653923. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438591.


Neuroplastic Responses to Chiropractic Care: Broad Impacts on Pain, Mood, Sleep, and Quality of Life.

Haavik H, Niazi I, Amjad I, Kumari N, Ghani U, Ashfaque M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595887 PMC: 11592102. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111124.


Known-Group Validity and Sensitivity to Change in the Sensory-Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire in Individuals with Neck Pain: A Pilot Study.

Ambalavanar U, McIntosh M, Haavik H, Murphy B Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595813 PMC: 11592273. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111050.