» Articles » PMID: 38205225

Effect Sizes for Changes in Health and Well-Being Following Treatment With the One-To-Zero Technique in Individuals With Occipito-Atlantal Joint Dysfunction: A Repeated Measures Study

Overview
Journal J Chiropr Med
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38205225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine effect sizes (ES) for changes in self-reported measures of musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction resulting from the one-to-zero method using a repeated measures study design.

Methods: Twenty participants presenting with articular dysfunction of the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) complex were treated using the one-to-zero method, a high-velocity low-amplitude thrust administered between the C0-C1 complex before treating other restrictive segments in a cephalocaudal direction. The participants completed online questionnaires using Google Forms that assessed aspects of the biopsychosocial model of pain at baseline and within a week after treatment. The questionnaires included the following: (1) Demographic and Health Behavior Survey; (2) Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) or Neck Disability Index (NDI); (3) Beck Anxiety Index (BAI); (4) Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); and (5) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Paired test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test was performed, dependent on normality. Cohen's values were calculated for each questionnaire score (0.20 indicative of small; ≥0.50 medium; and ≥0.80 large ES).

Results: The NDI, NBQ, BAI, and ISI had a large ES (all ≥ 0.80). In the SF-36, 4 subscales had a small to near-medium ES, 1 subscale had a medium to near-large ES, and the remaining 2 had a large ES ( ≥ 0.80). The physical and mental component summary had a large ( = 0.88) and small ES ( = 0.35), respectively.

Conclusion: The effect sizes suggest the one-to-zero treatment induces change in various aspects of the biopsychosocial model.

Citing Articles

Chiropractic rehabilitation in accelerated rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV hip dysplasia.

Deng G, Tan Z, Chen R, Fu R, Shu Y, Jiang W Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(30):e39117.

PMID: 39058838 PMC: 11272372. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039117.

References
1.
Blozik E, Laptinskaya D, Herrmann-Lingen C, Schaefer H, Kochen M, Himmel W . Depression and anxiety as major determinants of neck pain: a cross-sectional study in general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:13. PMC: 2636754. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-13. View

2.
Dunn A, Green B, Formolo L, Chicoine D . Chiropractic management for veterans with neck pain: a retrospective study of clinical outcomes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011; 34(8):533-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.08.009. View

3.
Hurwitz E, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski G, Yu F, Adams A . A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(10):1634-41. PMC: 1447299. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.10.1634. View

4.
Kyle B, McNeil D . Autonomic arousal and experimentally induced pain: a critical review of the literature. Pain Res Manag. 2014; 19(3):159-67. PMC: 4158962. DOI: 10.1155/2014/536859. View

5.
Dunning J, Cleland J, Waldrop M, Arnot C, Young I, Turner M . Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 42(1):5-18. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. View