» Articles » PMID: 17135618

A Randomized Clinical Trial Testing Treatment Preference and Two Dietary Options in Behavioral Weight Management: Preliminary Results of the Impact of Diet at 6 Months--PREFER Study

Overview
Date 2006 Dec 1
PMID 17135618
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The PREFER study objectives were to examine potential differences in weight loss during a standard behavioral intervention between subjects assigned to one of two calorie- and fat-restricted diets [standard behavior treatment (SBT) and lacto-ovo-vegetarian ([SBT+LOV)], with or without regard to their preferred dietary treatment. This article reports the differences in outcomes between diet groups after the first 6 months of the intervention.

Research Methods And Procedures: The study used a four-group design. Subjects (n = 182) were randomized to a treatment preference group and then to a dietary treatment group. For this report, preference groups were combined to permit comparisons by dietary treatment only (SBT, n = 98; SBT+LOV, n = 84). Additional analyses compared SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent (did not consume any meat, fish, or poultry, n = 47) to those who were <100% adherent (n = 24).

Results: Significant differences were seen in the baseline to 6-month change scores between the two groups for carbohydrate consumption (p = 0.013), protein consumption (p < 0.001), polyunsaturated-to-saturated fat ratio (p = 0.009), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level (p = 0.013). Among SBT+LOV subjects, those who were 100% adherent experienced greater reductions in weight (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p = 0.026), LDL-C (p = 0.034), and glucose (p = 0.002) and consumed less fat (p = 0.030) compared with those who were <100% adherent.

Discussion: Differences between dietary treatment groups at 6 months were minimal, most likely because one-third of the SBT+LOV group did not follow the vegetarian diet and because both groups had the same calorie and fat restrictions. SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent were more successful at both weight loss and cholesterol reduction than those who were <100% adherent, suggesting that vegetarian diets are efficacious for weight and cholesterol control.

Citing Articles

Vegetarian diets on anthropometric, metabolic and blood pressure outcomes in people with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Melgar B, Diaz-Arocutipa C, Huerta-Rengifo C, Piscoya A, Barboza J, Hernandez A Int J Obes (Lond). 2023; 47(10):903-910.

PMID: 37528197 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-023-01357-7.


Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Cardiometabolic Risk in People With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Wang T, Kroeger C, Cassidy S, Mitra S, Ribeiro R, Jose S JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(7):e2325658.

PMID: 37490288 PMC: 10369207. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25658.


Vegetarian or vegan diets and blood lipids: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Koch C, Kjeldsen E, Frikke-Schmidt R Eur Heart J. 2023; 44(28):2609-2622.

PMID: 37226630 PMC: 10361023. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad211.


Lifestyle Medicine and Economics: A Proposal for Research Priorities Informed by a Case Series of Disease Reversal.

Livingston K, Freeman K, Friedman S, Stout R, Lianov L, Drozek D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21).

PMID: 34769879 PMC: 8583680. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111364.


Common Limitations and Challenges of Dietary Clinical Trials for Translation into Clinical Practices.

Mirmiran P, Bahadoran Z, Gaeini Z Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 19(3):e108170.

PMID: 34567133 PMC: 8453651. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.108170.