» Articles » PMID: 17093225

Effects of Feed Restriction and Subsequent Refeeding on Energy Utilization in Growing Pigs

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2006 Nov 10
PMID 17093225
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1)). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.

Citing Articles

Growth Performance, Carcass Quality, and Lipid Metabolism in Krškopolje Pigs and Modern Hybrid Pigs: Comparison of Genotypes and Evaluation of Dietary Protein Reduction.

Skrlep M, Poklukar K, Vrecl M, Brankovic J, candek-Potokar M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39595384 PMC: 11591021. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223331.


Comparative analysis of whole blood transcriptomics between European and local Caribbean pigs in response to feed restriction in a tropical climate.

Poullet N, Devarieux O, Beramice D, Dantec L, Felicite Y, Feuillet D BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):292.

PMID: 37254043 PMC: 10230820. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09381-7.


Comparison of Global Metabolite for Growing Pigs Fed at Metabolizable Energy Requirement for Maintenance.

Liu H, Chen Y, Wang W, Jiang Z, Ma X, Wang F Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:917033.

PMID: 35898548 PMC: 9309205. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.917033.


Effect of feed restriction on the maintenance energy requirement of broiler breeders.

Teofilo G, Lizana R, Camargos R, Leme B, Morillo F, Silva R Anim Biosci. 2021; 35(5):690-697.

PMID: 34727646 PMC: 9065783. DOI: 10.5713/ab.21.0183.


Impact of single or repeated short-term heat challenges mimicking summer heat waves on thermoregulatory responses and performances in finishing pigs.

Renaudeau D Transl Anim Sci. 2021; 4(4):txaa192.

PMID: 34164611 PMC: 8216432. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaa192.