» Articles » PMID: 30890729

Effect of Feed Restriction and Refeeding on Performance and Metabolism of European and Caribbean Growing Pigs in a Tropical Climate

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Mar 21
PMID 30890729
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reduction in feed intake is a common physiological response of growing pigs facing stressful environmental conditions. The present experiment aims to study (1) the effects of a short-term feed restriction and refeeding on pig performance and metabolism and (2) the differential response between two breeds, Large White (LW), which has been selected for high performance, and Creole (CR), which is adapted to tropical conditions. A trial of 36 castrated male pigs (18 LW and 18 CR) was carried out. For each breed, half of the animals were restrictively fed at 50% of the standard feed allowance for 6 days and then fed normally for the next 14 days. Growth performance, thermoregulatory responses, plasma hormones and metabolites were measured. Results showed that, for all traits, the difference in response between the two breeds was small and rarely significant, which may be due to the short duration of the feed restriction. Irrespective of breed, feed restriction induced a reduction of growth rate and feed efficiency that was rapidly compensated for upon refeeding. Feed restriction also reduced skin temperature, rectal temperature and respiratory rate, as well as blood urea and cholesterol, which are of interest as potential biomarkers for feed restriction.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of whole blood transcriptomics between European and local Caribbean pigs in response to feed restriction in a tropical climate.

Poullet N, Devarieux O, Beramice D, Dantec L, Felicite Y, Feuillet D BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):292.

PMID: 37254043 PMC: 10230820. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09381-7.


Effects of Feed Removal during Acute Heat Stress on the Cytokine Response and Short-Term Growth Performance in Finishing Pigs.

Kpodo K, Duttlinger A, Maskal J, McConn B, Johnson J Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33467772 PMC: 7830497. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010205.


Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources.

Rauw W, Rydhmer L, Kyriazakis I, Overland M, Gilbert H, Dekkers J J Sci Food Agric. 2020; 100(9):3575-3586.

PMID: 32077492 PMC: 7318173. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10338.

References
1.
PRESTON R, Schnakenberg D, PFANDER W . PROTEIN UTILIZATION IN RUMINANTS. I. BLOOD UREA NITROGEN AS AFFECTED BY PROTEIN INTAKE. J Nutr. 1965; 86(3):281-8. DOI: 10.1093/jn/86.3.281. View

2.
de Braganca M, Prunier A . Effects of low feed intake and hot environment on plasma profiles of glucose, nonesterified fatty acids, insulin, glucagon, and IGF-I in lactating sows. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1999; 16(2):89-101. DOI: 10.1016/s0739-7240(99)00002-8. View

3.
Sobrino Crespo C, Perianes Cachero A, Puebla Jimenez L, Barrios V, Arilla Ferreiro E . Peptides and food intake. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014; 5:58. PMC: 4005944. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00058. View

4.
Cervantes M, Cota M, Arce N, Castillo G, Avelar E, Espinoza S . Effect of heat stress on performance and expression of selected amino acid and glucose transporters, HSP90, leptin and ghrelin in growing pigs. J Therm Biol. 2016; 59:69-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.04.014. View

5.
Rohart F, Paris A, Laurent B, Canlet C, Molina J, Mercat M . Phenotypic prediction based on metabolomic data for growing pigs from three main European breeds. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(13):4729-40. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5338. View