» Articles » PMID: 17068365

Comparison of Dose Calculation Algorithms for Treatment Planning in External Photon Beam Therapy for Clinical Situations

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2006 Oct 28
PMID 17068365
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A study of the performance of five commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs) for common treatment sites regarding their ability to model heterogeneities and scattered photons has been performed. The comparison was based on CT information for prostate, head and neck, breast and lung cancer cases. The TPSs were installed locally at different institutions and commissioned for clinical use based on local procedures. For the evaluation, beam qualities as identical as possible were used: low energy (6 MV) and high energy (15 or 18 MV) x-rays. All relevant anatomical structures were outlined and simple treatment plans were set up. Images, structures and plans were exported, anonymized and distributed to the participating institutions using the DICOM protocol. The plans were then re-calculated locally and exported back for evaluation. The TPSs cover dose calculation techniques from correction-based equivalent path length algorithms to model-based algorithms. These were divided into two groups based on how changes in electron transport are accounted for ((a) not considered and (b) considered). Increasing the complexity from the relatively homogeneous pelvic region to the very inhomogeneous lung region resulted in less accurate dose distributions. Improvements in the calculated dose have been shown when models consider volume scatter and changes in electron transport, especially when the extension of the irradiated volume was limited and when low densities were present in or adjacent to the fields. A Monte Carlo calculated algorithm input data set and a benchmark set for a virtual linear accelerator have been produced which have facilitated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The more sophisticated models in the type b group exhibit changes in both absorbed dose and its distribution which are congruent with the simulations performed by Monte Carlo-based virtual accelerator.

Citing Articles

Dummy run study for outlining and plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG1910 (AgedGlio-PIII).

Ono T, Uto M, Mineharu Y, Arakawa Y, Nakamura M, Nishio T Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):32.

PMID: 40059195 PMC: 11890525. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02612-z.


Virtual-simulation boosted neural network dose calculation engine for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Li Z, Liu Y, Shang X, Sheng H, Xie C, Zhao W Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40029538 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-025-01523-3.


Adaptation of dose-prescription for vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery taking body contouring method and heterogeneous material into account.

Fager M, Gubanski M, Carlsson Tedgren A, Benmakhlouf H Acta Oncol. 2025; 64:319-325.

PMID: 40008908 PMC: 11884334. DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.41924.


Quantification of uncertainties in reference and relative dose measurements, dose calculations, and patient setup in modern external beam radiotherapy.

Kinoshita N, Shimizu M, Motegi K, Tsuruta Y, Takakura T, Oguchi H Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 18(1):58-77.

PMID: 39541009 PMC: 11876197. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00856-0.


Comparative assessment and QA measurement array validation of Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone dose algorithms for small fields and clinical treatment plans.

Spenkelink G, Huijskens S, Zindler J, de Goede M, van der Star W, van Egmond J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(12):e14522.

PMID: 39287551 PMC: 11633799. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14522.