» Articles » PMID: 17067681

Cefepime Pharmacodynamics in Patients with Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase (ESBL) and Non-ESBL Infections

Overview
Journal J Infect
Date 2006 Oct 28
PMID 17067681
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome.

Methods: Cefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT>MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fC(min)/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures.

Results: Eradication was 80% when fT>MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T>MIC was less than 50% (p<0.05). The median fC(min)/MIC ratio for ESBL group was statistically lower than that for the non-ESBL group (1.54 versus 138, p<0.001). Regardless of ESBL production, all pathogens were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC>7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fC(min)/MIC< or =7.6 (p<0.05). Pharmacodynamic exposures of 50% fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC>1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2g q 12h and q 8h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4 g continuous infusion and 2g q 6-8h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2 microg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC=7.6.

Conclusion: Microbiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure.

Citing Articles

Challenges for global antibiotic regimen planning and establishing antimicrobial resistance targets: implications for the WHO Essential Medicines List and AWaRe antibiotic book dosing.

Reza N, Gerada A, Stott K, Howard A, Sharland M, Hope W Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024; 37(2):e0013923.

PMID: 38436564 PMC: 11324030. DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00139-23.


Antibiotics in anesthesia and critical care.

Premachandra A, Moine P Ann Transl Med. 2024; 12(1):6.

PMID: 38304898 PMC: 10777233. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-5585.


Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Infection Management in Critically Ill Patients.

Kalin G, Alp E, Chouaikhi A, Roger C Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894233 PMC: 10609422. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102575.


Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime.

Pais G, Chang J, Barreto E, Stitt G, Downes K, Alshaer M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022; 61(7):929-953.

PMID: 35764774 PMC: 9345683. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01137-y.


Therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime in a non-critically ill population: retrospective assessment and potential role for model-based dosing.

Suttels V, Andre P, Thoma Y, Veuve F, Decosterd L, Guery B JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022; 4(2):dlac043.

PMID: 35465238 PMC: 9021014. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac043.