» Articles » PMID: 16950102

Sexual Selection and Condition-dependent Mate Preferences

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Sep 5
PMID 16950102
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The last decade has witnessed considerable theoretical and empirical investigation of how male sexual ornaments evolve. This strong male-biased perspective has resulted in the relative neglect of variation in female mate preferences and its consequences for ornament evolution. As sexual selection is a co-evolutionary process between males and females, ignoring variation in females overlooks a key aspect of this process. Here, we review the empirical evidence that female mate preferences, like male ornaments, are condition dependent. We show accumulating support for the hypothesis that high quality females show the strongest mate preference. Nonetheless, this is still an infant field, and we highlight areas in need of more research, both theoretical and empirical. We also examine some of the wider implications of condition-dependent mating decisions and their effect on the strength of sexual selection.

Citing Articles

A new sexual selection pattern in a frog () with ultrasonic communication.

Liu G, Pan S, Shi Q, Lei Z, Wu J, Zhang H Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242139.

PMID: 39837520 PMC: 11750359. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2139.


Genetic Variation in Male Mate Choice for Large Females in .

Freed G, Martinez I, Lev A, Anthony Cuadrado A, Pischedda A Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(1):e70794.

PMID: 39790727 PMC: 11717482. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70794.


Male crickets in poor condition engage in less same-sex sexual behavior.

Richardson J, Hoversten I, Zuk M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(40):e2408811121.

PMID: 39312658 PMC: 11459157. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408811121.


The role of condition on sexual selection in the seed bug .

Balfour V, Corliss M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70226.

PMID: 39238569 PMC: 11374529. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70226.


Strength of female mate preferences in temperature manipulation study supports the signal reliability hypothesis.

Cobb N, Mason S, Tompkins K, Fitschen-Brown M, Rios-Cardenas O, Morris M PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0303691.

PMID: 38843264 PMC: 11156382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303691.