» Articles » PMID: 16944088

The Photopic Negative Response of the Flash Electroretinogram in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Overview
Journal Doc Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2006 Sep 1
PMID 16944088
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The photopic negative response (PhNR) has recently been shown to be severely affected in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), despite relative preservation of the cone b-wave compared to that in the healthy unaffected fellow eye. The aim of this study was to test how the PhNR of the flash electroretinogram (ERG) is affected in human retinal vein occlusion. PhNR was elicited with red stimuli (1 cd s/m2, 5 cd s/m2, and 7 cd s/m2 with 4 ms duration) and blue background (10 cd/m2). Standard Ganzfeld flash ERG was produced according to the ISCEV standard for the clinical electroretinogram (2004). Sixteen patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), 14 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and 16 controls were analyzed. The amplitude of the PhNRs was significantly smaller in the CRVO and BRVO eyes than those in the unaffected fellow or control eyes (p = 0.000). There was a significantly greater reduction of PhNR amplitudes than that of other waves including the OPs, rod b-wave, combined a-wave and b-wave, cone a-wave and b-wave, and 30 Hz flicker ERG. Thus, PhNR amplitude in retinal vein occlusion is severely affected. There is a potential role for PhNR in assessing inner retinal damage and evaluating the effect of treatment.

Citing Articles

Group comparisons of the individual electroretinogram time trajectories for the ascending limb of the b-wave using a raw and registered time series.

Brabec M, Constable P, Thompson D, Marmolejo-Ramos F BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):238.

PMID: 37773138 PMC: 10542250. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06535-4.


Significant correlations between focal photopic negative response and focal visual sensitivity and ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucomatous eyes.

Ishizuka M, Machida S, Hara Y, Tada A, Ebihara S, Gonmori M Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021; 66(1):41-51.

PMID: 34843022 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-021-00886-w.


Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Marmoy O, Viswanathan S Eye (Lond). 2021; 35(9):2386-2405.

PMID: 34117382 PMC: 8377055. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01614-x.


Impaired Ganglion Cell Function Objectively Assessed by the Photopic Negative Response in Affected and Asymptomatic Members From Brazilian Families With Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Botelho G, Salomao S, Tengan C, Karanjia R, Moura F, Rocha D Front Neurol. 2021; 11:628014.

PMID: 33584522 PMC: 7874135. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.628014.


Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Berezovsky A, Karanjia R, Fernandes A, Botelho G, Bueno T, Nunes Ferraz N Doc Ophthalmol. 2020; 142(2):153-163.

PMID: 32681419 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-020-09784-x.


References
1.
Larsson J, Andreasson S . Photopic 30 Hz flicker ERG as a predictor for rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(6):683-5. PMC: 1724015. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.6.683. View

2.
Hayreh S, Klugman M, Podhajsky P, Kolder H . Electroretinography in central retinal vein occlusion. Correlation of electroretinographic changes with pupillary abnormalities. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989; 227(6):549-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF02169451. View

3.
Drasdo N, Aldebasi Y, Chiti Z, Mortlock K, Morgan J, North R . The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(6):1266-72. View

4.
Viswanathan S, Frishman L, Robson J, Walters J . The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(2):514-22. View

5.
Robson J, Frishman L . Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram. Vis Neurosci. 1995; 12(5):837-50. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800009408. View