» Articles » PMID: 16941091

Choledocholithiasis: Repetitive Thick-slab Single-shot Projection Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreaticography Versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Aug 31
PMID 16941091
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective study compares repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. Fifty-seven consecutive patients (36 women, mean age 61) referred for suspected choledocholithiasis underwent MRCP, followed by EUS. Each procedure was performed by different operators blinded to the results of the other investigation. MR technique included a turbo spin-echo T2-weighted axial sequence with selective fat saturation (SPIR/TSE, TE=70 ms, TR=1,600 ms), followed by coronal dynamic MRCP. The same thick-slab slice was sequentially acquired 12 times as breath-hold single-shot projection imaging (SSh, TE=900 ms, TE=8,000 ms) centred on the common bile duct (CBD). Two experienced radiologists independently and blindly evaluated MR images for the detection of CBD stones. Their inter-observer agreement kappa was determined. Secondly, the two observers read MR images in consensus again. CBD stones were demonstrated in 18 out of 57 patients (31.6 %) and confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP, n=17) or intraoperative cholangiography (n=1). Clinical follow-up served as the "gold standard" in patients with negative results without following invasive procedure (n=28). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value for MRCP resulting from consensus reading were 94.9%, 94.4%, 94.7%, 97.4% and 89.5%, respectively. Corresponding values of EUS were 97.4%, 94.4%, 96.5%, 97.4% and 94.4%. Inter-observer agreement kappa was 0.81. Repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection MRCP is an accurate non-invasive imaging modality for suspected choledocholithiasis and should be increasingly used to select those patients who require a subsequent therapeutic procedure, namely ERCP.

Citing Articles

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Afzalpurkar S, Giri S, Kasturi S, Ingawale S, Sundaram S Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(4):2566-2573.

PMID: 36344899 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09744-3.


Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of patients with missed common bile duct stones.

Eissa M, Okasha H, Abbasy M, Khamis A, Abdellatef A, Rady M World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 14(9):564-574.

PMID: 36186945 PMC: 9516471. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i9.564.


EUS assessment for intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis after a negative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Wee D, Izard S, Grimaldi G, Raphael K, Lee T, Trindade A Endosc Ultrasound. 2020; 9(5):337-344.

PMID: 33106466 PMC: 7811724. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_57_20.


Gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) MR imaging: a long-existing technology that may find wide applications in modern era.

Chu M, Chien C, Wu W, Chung H Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019; 9(9):1477-1484.

PMID: 31667134 PMC: 6785504. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.13.


Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis: A systematic review.

Leite de Castro V, Moura E, Chaves D, Bernardo W, Matuguma S, Artifon E Endosc Ultrasound. 2016; 5(2):118-28.

PMID: 27080611 PMC: 4850791. DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.180476.


References
1.
Becker C, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F . Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1997; 205(2):523-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356639. View

2.
Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret P, Cortas G, Mehta S, Barkun A . Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998; 209(2):435-42. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807570. View

3.
Menon K, Barkun A, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta S, Reinhold C . Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(9):2646-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04117.x. View

4.
Deprez P . Approach of suspected common bile duct stones: endoscopic ultrasonography. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2001; 63(3):295-8. View

5.
Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P . MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 184(1):55-62. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840055. View