» Articles » PMID: 16923712

The Relationship Between Anatomic Variations of Paranasal Sinuses and Chronic Sinusitis in Children

Overview
Date 2006 Aug 23
PMID 16923712
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conclusions: Anatomical variations in the nose and paranasal sinuses are common in children. Due to the absence of a definitive relationship between anatomical variations and sinus disease, local, systemic or environmental factors appear to be more significant in pediatric sinusitis than the anatomic variations.

Objective: Chronic sinusitis is increasing in the pediatric population. Following the initial reports of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for children, the majority of patients undergoing this procedure have experienced improved quality of life. Thus, we need to know the precise anatomy and anatomical variations of the nose, as well as the relationship between such anatomy and chronic sinusitis.

Patients And Methods: To determine the extent and distribution of disease, as well as associated anatomic abnormalities, computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on 113 children with persistent symptoms of sinusitis after failure of medical therapies.

Results: The maxillary sinus was the most commonly involved sinus, followed by the ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses. There was no relationship between age and severity of sinusitis. Agger nasi cell was the most common anatomical variation, followed by septal deviation, Haller cell, concha bullosa, paradoxical middle turbinate, and Onodi cell. The prevalence of septal deviation increased with age. There was no significant relationship between the sinusitis and anatomic variations.

Citing Articles

Does Frontal Recess Cell Variation Associate with the Development of Frontal Sinusitis? A Narrative Review.

Al Habsi T, Al-Ajmi E, Washahi M, Lawati M, Maawali S, Mahajan A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201412 PMC: 10795722. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010103.


The Associations between the Maxillary Sinus Volume, Infraorbital Ethmoid Cells, and the Infraorbital Canal: A CT-Based Study.

Kedar E, Koren I, Medlej B, Hershkovitz I Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38066834 PMC: 10705937. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13233593.


Association among Orthodontic Malocclusions, Paranasal Sinuses Anatomic Variations and Adenoid Vegetation in Children Using CBCT.

Kose S, Aksoy S, Onder M, Oz U, Orhan K Children (Basel). 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37761511 PMC: 10528037. DOI: 10.3390/children10091549.


The Relationship between Sphenoid Sinus, Carotid Canal, and Optical Canal in Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography in Children.

Tursun S, Bayar Muluk N, Inal M, Goncuoglu A, Sencan Z J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023; 84(5):513-520.

PMID: 37671291 PMC: 10477008. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755574.


A comparative study of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity anatomic variations between the Polish and Turkish Cypriot Population with CBCT.

Gruszka K, Aksoy S, Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Gulbes M, Kalinowski P, Orhan K Head Face Med. 2022; 18(1):37.

PMID: 36435801 PMC: 9701382. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-022-00340-3.