» Articles » PMID: 36435801

A Comparative Study of Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity Anatomic Variations Between the Polish and Turkish Cypriot Population with CBCT

Overview
Journal Head Face Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36435801
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Genetic and environmental factors especially climatic conditions are thought to influence the shape and size of the paranasal sinuses and anatomic variations may create both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, no study has been published about the climatic adaptation of the paranasal sinus region in different populations. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of anatomical variants in the paranasal sinus and nasal cavity using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) between Polish and Turkish Cypriot populations.

Methods: The material consisted of volumes acquired utilizing Galileos (Sirona, Germany) as well as Newtom 3G (QR Verona, Newtom, Italy) CBCT units. There were examined 356 Polish and 359 Turkish Cypriot patients in whom paranasal sinuses were included in the field of view. Paranasal sinus anatomic variations were assessed in both populations.

Results: In the Polish population, the most common anatomic variation was septum deviation followed by the Agger nasi cell and concha bullosa with a prevalence of 87.7%, 83.2%, and 54.8% respectively. For the Turkish Cypriot population, the most common anatomic variation was Agger nasi cell followed by concha bullosa and supraorbital ethmoid cells with a prevalence of 81.6%, 68%, and 57.8% respectively. Many anatomic variations were found to show substantial differences among both populations. Incidence rates of hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus, septum pneumatization, supraorbital ethmoid cells, concha bullosa, uncinate bulla, and internal carotid artery protrusion into the sphenoid sinus were significantly higher in the Turkish Cypriot group, while the incidence of Haller cell, frontal sinus hypoplasia, maxillary sinus hypoplasia, ethmomaxillary sinus, sphenomaxillary plate, and septum deviation were significantly higher in Polish population.

Conclusion: According to the Köppen-Geiger world climatic map, the climate is warmer and drier in Turkish Cypriote populations than in the Polish population. These climatic differences influence the paranasal sinus variations between the Turkish Cypriot and Polish populations that must be taken into account by rhinologic surgeons especially when performing frontal and sphenoid sinus surgery.

Citing Articles

New Perspectives in the Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Haller Cells.

Nedelcu A, Tepordei R, Lupu A, Lupu V, Moraru M, Partene Vicoleanu S Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597052 PMC: 11596019. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111867.


Characterising Sinonasal Pneumatization in Patients with Nasal Septal Deviation: A CBCT-Based Study.

Patil K, Jogigowda S, Suresh N, Christopher V, Niranjan S, Basavarajappa R Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(6):5692-5698.

PMID: 39559018 PMC: 11569091. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05067-y.


Computed tomography assessment of maxillary sinus hypoplasia and associated anatomical variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global evidence.

Souza D, Costa F, de Mendonca D, Ribeiro E, Barros Silva P, Neves F Oral Radiol. 2023; 40(2):124-137.

PMID: 38079051 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00726-2.


Association among Orthodontic Malocclusions, Paranasal Sinuses Anatomic Variations and Adenoid Vegetation in Children Using CBCT.

Kose S, Aksoy S, Onder M, Oz U, Orhan K Children (Basel). 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37761511 PMC: 10528037. DOI: 10.3390/children10091549.

References
1.
Hodez C, Griffaton-Taillandier C, Bensimon I . Cone-beam imaging: applications in ENT. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011; 128(2):65-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2010.10.008. View

2.
John Wormald P . The agger nasi cell: the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129(5):497-507. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59980301581-X. View

3.
Daniels D, Mafee M, Smith M, Smith T, Naidich T, Brown W . The frontal sinus drainage pathway and related structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(8):1618-27. PMC: 7973969. View

4.
Chaiyasate S, Baron I, Clement P . Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: a CT genetic study in twins. Clin Otolaryngol. 2007; 32(2):93-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01404.x. View

5.
Khalil H, Eweiss A, Clifton N . Radiological findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective case series study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2011; 11:4. PMC: 3100233. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6815-11-4. View