» Articles » PMID: 16914460

Dexmedetomidine As an Anaesthetic Adjuvant in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized and Placebo-controlled Study

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2006 Aug 18
PMID 16914460
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been shown to provide good perioperative haemodynamic stability with decreased intraoperative opioid requirements. It may have neural protective effects, and thus may be a suitable anaesthetic adjuvant to neurosurgical anaesthesia.

Methods: Fifty-four patients scheduled for elective surgery of supratentorial brain tumour were randomized to receive in a double-blind manner a continuous DEX infusion (plasma target concentration 0.2 or 0.4 ng ml(-1)) or placebo, beginning 20 min before anaesthesia and continuing until the start of skin closure. The DEX groups received fentanyl 2 microg kg(-1) at the induction of anaesthesia and before the start of operation, the placebo group 4 microg kg(-1), respectively. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane.

Results: The median times from the termination of N2O to extubation were 6 (3-27), 3 (0-20) and 4 (0-13) min in placebo, DEX-0.2 and DEX-0.4 groups, respectively (P<0.05 anova all-over effect). The median percentage of time points when systolic blood pressure was within more or less than 20% of the intraoperative mean was 72, 77 and 85, respectively (P<0.01), DEX-0.4 group differed significantly from the other groups. DEX blunted the tachycardic response to intubation (P<0.01) and the hypertensive response to extubation (P<0.01). DEX-0.4 group differed in the heart rate variability from placebo (93 vs 82%, P<0.01).

Conclusions: DEX increased perioperative haemodynamic stability in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery. Compared with fentanyl, the trachea was extubated [corrected] faster without respiratory depression.

Citing Articles

Opioid-free anesthesia in enhanced recovery after supratentorial craniotomies: a case series.

Setiadi I, Alifahna M, Halimi R, Bisri D J Med Life. 2025; 17(12):1061-1066.

PMID: 39877039 PMC: 11771829. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2024-0280.


Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl-based total intravenous anesthesia technique on the requirement of propofol, brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, neuronal injury, and hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute traumatic subdural....

Chandar Chinnarasan V, Bidkar P, Swaminathan S, Mani M, Vairappan B, Chatterjee P Surg Neurol Int. 2025; 15():462.

PMID: 39777171 PMC: 11704446. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_892_2024.


Evaluation of effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or lignocaine on stress response and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for intracranial tumors: A randomized controlled exploratory study.

Shekhar S, Goyal N, Mirza A, Agrawal S Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18(3):402-409.

PMID: 39149745 PMC: 11323921. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_141_24.


Nebulized Versus Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine for Obtunding Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Study.

Singla A, Saraswat R, Bharadwaj A, Singh S Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54768.

PMID: 38524064 PMC: 10961112. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54768.


Comparison of Opioid-Based Versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Glioma Surgery.

A S A, Kaushal A, Waindeskar V, Saigal S, Jain A, Kumar H Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54153.

PMID: 38496110 PMC: 10940869. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54153.