» Articles » PMID: 16893004

Preparatory Adjustment of Cognitive Control in the Task Switching Paradigm

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2006 Aug 9
PMID 16893004
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, the authors investigate the assumption that preparation while switching between cognitive tasks is dynamically adjusted to the current task demands. Performance in high-shift blocks (75% shifts) was compared with performance in high-repetition blocks (75% repetitions). This probability information was given either at the beginning of a block (global condition) or by specific probability cues before every trial (local condition). The authors report strong preparation effects (activation of the probable task and inhibition of the improbable task) in high-shift blocks, especially when specific probability cues were provided. In high-repetition blocks, however, the preparation effects were less pronounced. The results support the assumption that preparation is dynamically adjusted to the expected task requirements.

Citing Articles

Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.

Egner T Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 2(11):702-714.

PMID: 39301103 PMC: 11409542. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4.


Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.

Berger A, Koch I, Kiefer M Psychol Res. 2024; 88(7):2036-2058.

PMID: 39080024 PMC: 11450066. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02013-z.


Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.

Strivens A, Koch I, Lavric A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(3):750-767.

PMID: 38212478 PMC: 11062987. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02841-y.


Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.

Egner T, Siqi-Liu A Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024; 55.

PMID: 38186744 PMC: 10769152. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342.


Learning Cognitive Flexibility: Neural Substrates of Adapting Switch-Readiness to Time-varying Demands.

Sali A, Bejjani C, Egner T J Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 36(2):377-393.

PMID: 38010299 PMC: 10902878. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02091.


References
1.
Sudevan P, Taylor D . The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987; 13(1):89-103. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.89. View

2.
Koch I . Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(6):1474-86. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1474. View

3.
Mayr U, Keele S . Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000; 129(1):4-26. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.4. View

4.
Sohn M, Carlson R . Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1445-60. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1445. View

5.
Koch I . Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 12(1):107-12. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196354. View