» Articles » PMID: 16879750

The Relationship Between Unsupervised Time After School and Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 Aug 2
PMID 16879750
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rising obesity and declining physical activity levels are of great concern because of the associated health risks. Many children are left unsupervised after the school day ends, but little is known about the association between unsupervised time and physical activity levels. This paper seeks to determine whether adolescent girls who are without adult supervision after school are more or less active than their peers who have a caregiver at home.

Methods: A random sample of girls from 36 middle schools at 6 field sites across the U.S. was selected during the fall of the 2002-2003 school year to participate in the baseline measurement activities of the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG). Information was collected using six-day objectively measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity using a three-day recall, and socioeconomic and psychosocial measures. Complete information was available for 1422 out of a total of 1596 respondents.Categorical variables were analyzed using chi square and continuous variables were analyzed by t-tests. The four categories of time alone were compared using a mixed linear model controlling for clustering effects by study center.

Results: Girls who spent more time after school (> or = 2 hours per day, > or = 2 days per week) without adult supervision were more active than those with adult supervision (p = 0.01). Girls alone for > or = 2 hours after school, > or = 2 days a week, on average accrue 7.55 minutes more moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day than do girls who are supervised (95% confidence interval ([C.I]). These results adjusted for ethnicity, parent's education, participation in the free/reduced lunch program, neighborhood resources, or available transportation. Unsupervised girls (n = 279) did less homework (53.1% vs. 63.3%), spent less time riding in a car or bus (48.0% vs. 56.6%), talked on the phone more (35.5% vs. 21.1%), and watched more television (59.9% vs. 52.6%) than supervised girls (n = 569). However, unsupervised girls also were more likely to be dancing (14.0% vs. 9.3%) and listening to music (20.8% vs. 12.0%) (p < .05).

Conclusion: Girls in an unsupervised environment engaged in fewer structured activities and did not immediately do their homework, but they were more likely to be physically active than supervised girls. These results may have implications for parents, school, and community agencies as to how to structure activities in order to encourage teenage girls to be more physically active.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 pandemic and changes in children's physical activity in a rural US community: a mixed methods study.

Kellstedt D, Essay A, Schenkelberg M, Rosen M, J Von Seggern M, Idoate R BMJ Open. 2022; 12(10):e062987.

PMID: 36302579 PMC: 9620527. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062987.


Critical Hours and Important Environments: Relationships between Afterschool Physical Activity and the Physical Environment Using GPS, GIS and Accelerometers in 10-12-Year-Old Children.

Remmers T, Thijs C, Ettema D, de Vries S, Slingerland M, Kremers S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(17).

PMID: 31461924 PMC: 6747485. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173116.


Predictors for physical activity in adolescent girls using statistical shrinkage techniques for hierarchical longitudinal mixed effects models.

Grant E, Young D, Wu T PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0125431.

PMID: 25928064 PMC: 4416015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125431.


Development and psychometric properties of the Y-PASS questionnaire to assess correlates of lunchtime and after-school physical activity in children.

Stanley R, Ridley K, Olds T, Dollman J BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:412.

PMID: 24885601 PMC: 4041362. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-412.


Socioeconomic position and childhood sedentary time: evidence from the PEACH project.

Pulsford R, Griew P, Page A, Cooper A, Hillsdon M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:105.

PMID: 24007492 PMC: 3844440. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-105.


References
1.
Anderssen N, Wold B . Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992; 63(4):341-8. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10608754. View

2.
Weston A, Petosa R, Pate R . Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29(1):138-43. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199701000-00020. View

3.
Pettit G, Bates J, Dodge K, Meece D . The impact of after-school peer contact on early adolescent externalizing problems is moderated by parental monitoring, perceived neighborhood safety, and prior adjustment. Child Dev. 1999; 70(3):768-78. PMC: 2761644. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00055. View

4.
McMurray R, Ring K, Treuth M, Welk G, Pate R, Schmitz K . Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(12):2135-43. PMC: 2422874. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000147628.78551.3b. View

5.
Katzmarzyk P, Malina R, Song T, Bouchard C . Television viewing, physical activity, and health-related fitness of youth in the Québec Family Study. J Adolesc Health. 1998; 23(5):318-25. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00070-6. View