» Articles » PMID: 16874492

Patient Safety in Intensive Care: Results from the Multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) Study

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2006 Jul 29
PMID 16874492
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess on a multinational level the prevalence and corresponding factors of selected unintended events that compromise patient safety (sentinel events) in intensive care units (ICUs).

Design: An observational, 24-h cross-sectional study of incidents in five representative categories.

Setting: 205 ICUs worldwide

Measurements: Events were reported by intensive care unit staff members with the use of a structured questionnaire. Both ICU- and patient-related factors were assessed.

Results: In 1,913 adult patients a total of 584 events affecting 391 patients were reported. During 24 h multiple errors related to medication occurred in 136 patients; unplanned dislodgement or inappropriate disconnection of lines, catheters, and drains in 158; equipment failure in 112; loss, obstruction or leakage of artificial airway in 47; and inappropriate turn-off of alarms in 17. Per 100 patient days, 38.8 (95% confidence interval 34.7-42.9) events were observed. In a multiple logistic regression with ICU as a random component, the following were associated with elevated odds for experiencing a sentinel event: any organ failure (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.28), a higher intensity in level of care (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.22), and time of exposure (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.08).

Conclusions: Sentinel events related to medication, indwelling lines, airway, and equipment failure in ICUs occur with considerable frequency. Although patient safety is recognised as a serious issue in many ICUs, there is an urgent need for development and implementation of strategies for prevention and early detection of errors.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Line and Tube Detection Performance of a Chest X-ray Deep Learning Model to Evaluate Hidden Stratification.

Tang C, Seah J, Ahmad H, Milne M, Wardman J, Buchlak Q Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(14).

PMID: 37510062 PMC: 10378683. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142317.


The associations of psychological burnout and time factors on medication errors in rotating shift nurses in Korea: A cross sectional descriptive study.

Im C, Song S, Kim K Nurs Open. 2023; 10(8):5550-5559.

PMID: 37115503 PMC: 10333822. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1794.


Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach.

Montazeri M, Khajouei R, Mahdavi A, Ahmadian L J Med Syst. 2023; 47(1):47.

PMID: 37058148 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-01943-2.


Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dillner P, Eggenschwiler L, Rutjes A, Berg L, Musy S, Simon M BMJ Qual Saf. 2022; 32(3):133-149.

PMID: 36572528 PMC: 9985739. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298.


A qualitative study of medical-surgical intensive care unit nurses' experiences in caring for critical patients.

Totur Dikmen B, Bayraktar N, Yilmaz U Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022; 56:e20220220.

PMID: 36382933 PMC: 10081655. DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0220en.


References
1.
Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M . Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322(7285):517-9. PMC: 26554. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517. View

2.
Chang A, Schyve P, Croteau R, OLeary D, Loeb J . The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005; 17(2):95-105. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi021. View

3.
Altman D, Clancy C, Blendon R . Improving patient safety--five years after the IOM report. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(20):2041-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp048243. View

4.
Vincent C, Stanhope N . Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999; 5(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00147.x. View

5.
Wilson R, Runciman W, Gibberd R, Harrison B, Newby L, Hamilton J . The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995; 163(9):458-71. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x. View