» Articles » PMID: 32131872

Effects of a National Quality Improvement Program on ICUs in China: a Controlled Pre-post Cohort Study in 586 Hospitals

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32131872
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patient safety and critical care quality remain a challenging issue in the ICU. However, the effects of the national quality improvement (QI) program remain unknown in China.

Methods: A national ICU QI program was implemented in a controlled cohort of 586 hospitals from 2016 to 2018. The effects of the QI program on critical care quality were comprehensively investigated.

Main Results: A total of 81,461,554 patients were enrolled in 586 hospitals, and 1,587,724 patients were admitted to the ICU over 3 years. In 2018, there was a significantly higher number of ICU beds (2016 vs. 2018: 10668 vs. 13,661, P = 0.0132) but a lower doctor-to-bed ratio (2016 vs. 2018: 0.64 (0.50, 0.83) vs. 0.60 (0.45, 0.75), P = 0.0016) and nurse-to-bed ratio (2016 vs. 2018: 2.00 (1.64, 2.50) vs. 2.00 (1.50, 2.40), P = 0.031) than in 2016. Continuous and significant improvements in the ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence rate, microbiology detection rate before antibiotic use and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis rate were associated with the implementation of the QI program (VAP incidence rate (per 1000 ventilator-days), 2016 vs. 2017 vs. 2018: 11.06 (4.23, 22.70) vs. 10.20 (4.25, 23.94) vs. 8.05 (3.13, 17.37), P = 0.0002; microbiology detection rate before antibiotic use (%), 2016 vs. 2017 vs. 2018: 83.91 (49.75, 97.87) vs. 84.14 (60.46, 97.24) vs. 90.00 (69.62, 100), P < 0.0001; DVT prophylaxis rate, 2016 vs. 2017 vs. 2018: 74.19 (33.47, 96.16) vs. 71.70 (38.05, 96.28) vs. 83.27 (47.36, 97.77), P = 0.0093). Moreover, the 6-h SSC bundle compliance rates in 2018 were significantly higher than those in 2016 (6-h SSC bundle compliance rate, 2016 vs. 2018: 64.93 (33.55, 93.06) vs. 76.19 (46.88, 96.67)). A significant change trend was not found in the ICU mortality rate from 2016 to 2018 (ICU mortality rate (%), 2016 vs. 2017 vs. 2018: 8.49 (4.42, 14.82) vs. 8.95 (4.89, 15.70) vs. 9.05 (5.12, 15.80), P = 0.1075).

Conclusions: The relationship between medical human resources and ICU overexpansion was mismatched during the past 3 years. The implementation of a national QI program improved ICU performance but did not reduce ICU mortality.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a Global Initiative for Asthma Education and Implementation Program to Improve Asthma Care Quality (CARE4ALL): Protocol for a Multicenter, Single-Arm Study.

Huang K, Wang W, Wang Y, Li Y, Feng X, Shen H JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14():e65197.

PMID: 39778197 PMC: 11754978. DOI: 10.2196/65197.


Association between ICU quality and in-hospital mortality of V-V ECMO-supported patients-the ECMO quality improvement action (EQIA) study: a national cohort study in China from 2017 to 2019.

Cheng W, Chen J, Ma X, Sun J, Gao S, Wang Y Front Med. 2023; 18(2):315-326.

PMID: 37991709 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-023-1014-x.


Impact of Nosocomial Infection on in-Hospital Mortality Rate in Adult Patients Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Cardiac Surgery.

Li X, Wang X, Wang L, Li C, Hao X, Du Z Infect Drug Resist. 2023; 16:4189-4200.

PMID: 37404257 PMC: 10315138. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S390599.


Evaluation of ICUs and weight of quality control indicators: an exploratory study based on Chinese ICU quality data from 2015 to 2020.

Su L, Ma X, Gao S, Yin Z, Chen Y, Wang W Front Med. 2023; 17(4):675-684.

PMID: 37060524 PMC: 10105137. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-022-0970-x.


Association between quality control and outcomes of septic shock caused by intestinal perforation in China: a cross-sectional study.

Wang L, Ma X, He H, Su L, Guo Y, Shan G Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3373.

PMID: 36849534 PMC: 9971201. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30551-w.


References
1.
Garrouste-Orgeas M, Soufir L, Tabah A, Schwebel C, Vesin A, Adrie C . A multifaceted program for improving quality of care in intensive care units: IATROREF study. Crit Care Med. 2011; 40(2):468-76. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d94d. View

2.
Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R, Cecconi M, Chiche J, De Backer D . The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(9):1620-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3906-y. View

3.
Cavalcanti A, Bozza F, Machado F, Salluh J, Campagnucci V, Vendramim P . Effect of a Quality Improvement Intervention With Daily Round Checklists, Goal Setting, and Clinician Prompting on Mortality of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 315(14):1480-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.3463. View

4.
Liu L, Liu D, Qiu H . Critical care medicine in China: history and perspective. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013; 126(10):1806-8. View

5.
van der Voort P, van der Veer S, de Vos M . The use of indicators to improve the quality of intensive care: theoretical aspects and experiences from the Dutch intensive care registry. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56(9):1084-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02687.x. View