» Articles » PMID: 16872793

Development and First Validation of the Shared Decision-making Questionnaire (SDM-Q)

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2006 Jul 29
PMID 16872793
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Due to a lack of valid German instruments measuring shared decision-making (SDM), a theory-driven questionnaire (SDM-Q) to measure the process of SDM was developed and validated.

Methods: As a theoretical basis steps of the SDM process were defined in an expert panel. Item formulation was then conducted according to the Delphi method. For the first validation on a mixed sample Rasch analysis was used to eliminate items not fitting the construct thus receiving a unidimensional scale.

Results: After eliminating 4 items the remaining 11 form a unidimensional scale with an acceptable reliability for person measures (0.77) and very good reliability for item difficulties (0.95). Analysis of subgroups revealed a different use of items in different conditions. Furthermore the scale showed high ceiling effects.

Conclusion: A new theory-driven instrument to measure the process of SDM has been developed and validated by use of a rigorous method revealing first promising results. Yet the ceiling effects require the addition of more discriminating items, and the different use of items in different conditions demands an in depth analysis.

Practice Implications: While the concept of SDM is constantly receiving more attention in medical practice, its valid and reliable measurement remains challenging.

Citing Articles

Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.

Del Olmo Rodriguez M, Martos Martinez R, Pascual Martinez A, Miranda Castillo C, Short Apellaniz J, Pfang B Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1452440.

PMID: 39267640 PMC: 11390557. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440.


Cross-sectional study of therapy-related expectations/concerns of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and physicians in Japan.

Kimura G, Fujii Y, Osawa T, Uchitomi Y, Honda K, Kondo M Cancer Med. 2024; 13(11):e7196.

PMID: 38872405 PMC: 11176571. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7196.


Improving shared decision making for lung cancer treatment by developing and validating an open-source web based patient decision aid for stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer.

Halilaj I, Ankolekar A, Lenaers A, Chatterjee A, Oberije C, Eppings L Front Digit Health. 2024; 5:1303261.

PMID: 38586126 PMC: 10995236. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1303261.


Simplified rules-based tool to facilitate the application of up-to-date management recommendations in cardio-oncology.

Brown S, Hamid A, Pederson E, Bs A, Maddula R, Goodman R Cardiooncology. 2023; 9(1):37.

PMID: 37891699 PMC: 10605976. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-023-00179-w.


An opponent model for agent-based shared decision-making via a genetic algorithm.

Lin K, Wei Y, Liu Y, Hong F, Yang Y, Lu P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1124734.

PMID: 37854140 PMC: 10580805. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124734.