» Articles » PMID: 35481437

Shared Decision-making in General Practice from a Patient Perspective. A Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Apr 28
PMID 35481437
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to assess patient involvement in terms of shared decision-making in general practice from the perspectives of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (or both).

Design: A cross-sectional survey using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) ranging from 0 to 5 (best).

Setting And Subjects: Patients diagnosed with either T2DM and/or COPD were asked to focus on their most recent consultation in general practice concerning their T2DM or lung disease. Responders were approached through the Danish Diabetes Association and Danish Lung Association.

Results: The sample included 468 responders. Mean scores for the total sample were between 3.3 and 4.2. The overall mean score for all items was 3.7. The highest overall mean score was for patients with T2DM, whereas the lowest overall mean score was for patients having both T2DM and COPD. Furthermore, we observed a slightly lower overall mean score for women compared to men and for those younger than 65 years compared to those aged 65 years or older.

Conclusion: Overall, patients are involved in shared decision-making in general practice Minor nuances were found because patients with COPD were less involved in shared decision-making compared to patients with T2DM. Similarly, younger patients and women were less involved than older patients and men.

Citing Articles

Shared decision making applied to self-management program for hypertensive patients: A scoping review protocol.

Yun S, Song M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0309593.

PMID: 39570818 PMC: 11581201. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309593.


How should a general practitioner say no to a patient?.

Ekblad M Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023; 41(4):353-354.

PMID: 37640676 PMC: 11001334. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2250398.

References
1.
Florin J, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M . Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions. J Clin Nurs. 2006; 15(12):1498-508. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01464.x. View

2.
Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape L, Sheridan S, Donaldson L, Pittet D . Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(1):53-62. PMC: 2800278. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248. View

3.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(8):573-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. View

4.
Ernst J, Kuhnt S, Schwarzer A, Aldaoud A, Niederwieser D, Mantovani-Loffler L . The desire for shared decision making among patients with solid and hematological cancer. Psychooncology. 2010; 20(2):186-93. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1723. View

5.
Doherr H, Christalle E, Kriston L, Harter M, Scholl I . Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173904. PMC: 5373562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173904. View