» Articles » PMID: 16844491

Intrauterine Insemination with Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Versus Expectant Management for Couples with Unexplained Subfertility and an Intermediate Prognosis: a Randomised Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Jul 18
PMID 16844491
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is commonly used as first-line treatment for couples with unexplained subfertility. Since such treatment increases the risk of multiple pregnancy, a couple's chances of achieving an ongoing pregnancy without it should be considered to identify those most likely to benefit from treatment. We aimed to assess the incremental effectiveness of intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation compared with expectant management in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis of a spontaneous ongoing pregnancy.

Methods: 253 couples with unexplained subfertility and a 30-40% probability of a spontaneous ongoing pregnancy within 12 months were randomly assigned either intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for 6 months or expectant management for 6 months. The primary endpoint of this hospital-based study was ongoing pregnancy within 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register and as an International Standard Randomised Clinical Trial, number ISRCTN72675518.

Findings: Of the 253 couples enrolled, 127 were assigned intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and 126 expectant management. In the intervention group, 42 (33%) women conceived and 29 (23%) pregnancies were ongoing. In the expectant management group, 40 (32%) women conceived and 34 (27%) pregnancies were ongoing (relative risk 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.1). There was one twin pregnancy in each study group, and one woman in the intervention group conceived triplets.

Interpretation: A large beneficial effect of intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis can be excluded. Expectant management for 6 months is therefore justified in these couples.

Citing Articles

The web-based Pleasure&Pregnancy programme in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a randomized controlled trial.

Dreischor F, Dancet E, Lambalk C, van Lunsen H, Besselink D, van Disseldorp J Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(12):2711-2721.

PMID: 39352942 PMC: 11630088. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae220.


Prognosis-based management of unexplained infertility-why not?.

Shingshetty L, Wang R, Feng Q, Maheshwari A, Mol B Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(2):hoae015.

PMID: 38716407 PMC: 11075788. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae015.


In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.

Sunkara S, Kamath M, Pandian Z, Gibreel A, Bhattacharya S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 9:CD003357.

PMID: 37753821 PMC: 10523437. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub5.


Expectant management versus IUI in unexplained subfertility and a poor pregnancy prognosis (EXIUI study): a randomized controlled trial.

Wessel J, Mochtar M, Besselink D, Betjes H, de Bruin J, Cantineau A Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(12):2808-2816.

PMID: 36331493 PMC: 9712943. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac236.


The needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception: in-depth interviews.

Dreischor F, Laan E, Peeters F, Peeraer K, Lambalk C, Goddijn M Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022(4):hoac037.

PMID: 36134038 PMC: 9479888. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac037.