Isolation of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria from the Air Plume Downwind of a Swine Confined or Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation

Overview

Journal Environ Health Perspect

Date 2006 Jul 13

PMID 16835055

Citations 46

Authors

Shawn G Gibbs

Christopher F Green

Patrick M Tarwater

Linda C Mota

Kristina D Mena

Pasquale V Scarpino

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: In this study we evaluated the levels of antibiotic- and multidrug-resistant bacteria in bioaerosols upwind, within, and downwind at locations 25 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 150 m from a swine confined animal feeding operation.

Design: We used Andersen two-stage samplers to collect bacterial samples, the replicate plate method to isolate organisms, and the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method to determine antibiotic resistance.

Results: The percentage of organisms resistant to at least two antibiotic classes and all four classes evaluated were, respectively, 2.1 and 3.0 times higher inside (n = 69) than upwind (n = 59) of the facility. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organism recovered. Concentrations of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus decreased with increasing distance from the facility. Using Fisher's exact methods, the change in distribution of antibiotic resistance profiles for each antibiotic was statistically significant (oxytetracycline, p = 0.010; tetracycline, p = 0.014; ampicillin, p = 0.007; erythromycin, p = 0.035); however, this relationship was not seen with lincomycin and penicillin (p > 0.05) . In addition, the levels of antibiotic-resistant S.aureus 25 m downwind were significantly greater than the levels from samples taken upwind from the facility for the same four antibiotics (p < 0.05) . The percentage of resistant group A streptococci and fecal coliform increased within the facility compared with upwind values for all antibiotics evaluated,except for lincomycin. The percentage of resistant total coliform organisms increased within the facility compared with upwind values for oxytetracycline and tetracycline.

Conclusions: Bacterial concentrations with multiple antibiotic resistances or multidrug resistance were recovered inside and outside to (at least) 150 m downwind of this facility at higher percentages than upwind. Bacterial concentrations with multiple antibiotic resistances were found within and downwind of the facility even after subtherapeutic antibiotics were discontinued. This could pose a potential human health effect for those who work within or live in close proximity to these facilities.

Citing Articles

Associations between acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in the upper respiratory tract and livestock farm exposures: a case-control study in COPD and non-COPD individuals.

Cornu Hewitt B, Bossers A, van Kersen W, de Rooij M, Smit L J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 79(12):3160-3168.

PMID: 39315772 PMC: 11638102. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae335.

Metagenomic insights into isolable bacterial communities and antimicrobial resistance in airborne dust from pig farms.

Hein S, Prathan R, Srisanga S, Muenhor D, Wongsurawat T, Jenjaroenpun P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1362011.

PMID: 38872793 PMC: 11169874. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1362011.

Contribution of Manure-Spreading Operations to Bioaerosols and Antibiotic Resistance Genes' Emission.

Baghdadi M, Brassard P, Godbout S, Letourneau V, Turgeon N, Rossi F Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7).

PMID: 37512969 PMC: 10386661. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11071797.

Prevalence and abundance of antibiotic-resistant genes in culturable bacteria inhabiting a non-polar passu glacier, karakorum mountains range, Pakistan.

Nawaz S, Rafiq M, Pepper I, Betancourt W, Shah A, Hasan F World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023; 39(4):94.

PMID: 36754876 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03532-4.

Role of Bioaerosols on the Short-Distance Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA) in a Chicken Farm Environment.

Hsu B, Chen J, Hsu G, Koner S, Nagarajan V, Tsai H Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35052958 PMC: 8773248. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11010081.

References

Haglind P, Rylander R . Occupational exposure and lung function measurements among workers in swine confinement buildings. J Occup Med. 1987; 29(11):904-7. View

Predicala B, Urban J, Maghirang R, Jerez S, Goodband R . Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction. Curr Microbiol. 2002; 44(2):136-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-001-0064-y. View

Perez-Trallero E, Zigorraga C . Resistance to antimicrobial agents as a public health problem: importance of the use of antibiotics in animals. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1995; 6(2):59-63. View

Johnsen P, Osterhus J, Sletvold H, Sorum M, Kruse H, Nielsen K . Persistence of animal and human glycopeptide-resistant enterococci on two Norwegian poultry farms formerly exposed to avoparcin is associated with a widespread plasmid-mediated vanA element within a polyclonal enterococcus faecium population. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(1):159-68. PMC: 544227. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.159-168.2005. View

BAUER A, KIRBY W, SHERRIS J, Turck M . Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966; 45(4):493-6. View

Green C, Gibbs S, Tarwater P, Mota L, Scarpino P . Bacterial plume emanating from the air surrounding swine confinement operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006; 3(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1080/15459620500430615. View

Takafuji E . The effect of antibiotic drug resistance on the environment and its impact on public health. Prev Med. 1977; 6(2):312-8. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(77)90057-3. View

Davies R, Roberts T . Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from commercial swine carcasses: effect of feed additives. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000; 29(5):327-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00634.x. View

Chapin A, Rule A, Gibson K, Buckley T, Schwab K . Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(2):137-42. PMC: 1277855. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7473. View

10.

Burriel A . Resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from sheep to various antimicrobial agents. Res Vet Sci. 1998; 63(2):189-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(97)90016-3. View

11.

Lenhart S, Olenchock S, COLE E . Viable sampling for airborne bacteria in a poultry processing plant. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1982; 10(4-5):613-9. DOI: 10.1080/15287398209530280. View

12.

DuPont H, STEELE J . Use of antimicrobial agents in animal feeds: implications for human health. Rev Infect Dis. 1987; 9(3):447-60. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/9.3.447. View

13.

Witte W . Medical consequences of antibiotic use in agriculture. Science. 1998; 279(5353):996-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5353.996. View

14.

Gibbs S, Green C, Tarwater P, Scarpino P . Airborne antibiotic resistant and nonresistant bacteria and fungi recovered from two swine herd confined animal feeding operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 1(11):699-706. DOI: 10.1080/15459620490515824. View

15.

Jensen P, Todd W, Davis G, SCARPINO P . Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992; 53(10):660-7. DOI: 10.1080/15298669291360319. View

16.

McGeer A . Agricultural antibiotics and resistance in human pathogens: villain or scapegoat?. CMAJ. 1998; 159(9):1119-20. PMC: 1229779. View

17.

Manson J, Smith J, Cook G . Persistence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in New Zealand broilers after discontinuation of avoparcin use. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(10):5764-8. PMC: 522085. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.5764-5768.2004. View

18.

Threlfall E, Rowe B, Ward L . A comparison of multiple drug resistance in salmonellas from humans and food animals in England and Wales, 1981 and 1990. Epidemiol Infect. 1993; 111(2):189-97. PMC: 2271397. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800056892. View

19.

Nijsten R, London N, van den Bogaard A, Stobberingh E . Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolated from faecal samples of pig farmers and pigs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996; 37(6):1131-40. DOI: 10.1093/jac/37.6.1131. View

20.

LEDERBERG J, LEDERBERG E . Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. J Bacteriol. 1952; 63(3):399-406. PMC: 169282. DOI: 10.1128/jb.63.3.399-406.1952. View