» Articles » PMID: 16813622

Anastomotic Leakage After Lower Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Men Are at a Higher Risk

Overview
Journal ANZ J Surg
Date 2006 Jul 4
PMID 16813622
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication specific to intestinal surgery. The aim of this study was to review the anastomotic leakage rates in a single Colorectal Unit and to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis.

Methods: A total of 541 consecutive operations involving anastomoses of the colon and rectum that were carried out between 1999 and 2004 at a single colorectal unit were reviewed. Data concerning 35 variables, relating to patient, tumour and surgical factors, were recorded. Outcomes with respect to anastomotic leakage and mortality were recorded. Data were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses and odds ratios (OR) calculated.

Results: The overall rate of anastomotic leakage was 6.5% (35 of 541). The most frequently carried out operations were right hemicolectomy and anterior resection of the rectum, with leak rates of 2.2 and 7.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that male gender (OR = 3.5), previous abdominal surgery (OR = 2.4), Crohn's disease (OR = 3.3), rectal cancer < or =12 cm from the anal verge (OR = 5.4) and prolonged operating time (OR = 2.8) were factors significantly associated with anastomotic leakage. Male gender, a history of previous abdominal surgery and the presence of a low cancer remained significant after multivariate analysis. The risk of anastomotic leakage increased when two or more risk factors were present (P < 0.01). The overall mortality was 3.7% and was higher in patients with anastomotic leakage (14.3%; P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Male gender, previous abdominal surgery and low rectal cancer are associated with increased anastomotic leakage rates. These have important implications during preoperative patient counselling and decision-making regarding defunctioning stoma formation.

Citing Articles

Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Martin-Arevalo J, Moro-Valdezate D, Perez-Santiago L, Lopez-Mozos F, Pena C, Carbonell Asins J Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40(1):13.

PMID: 39814974 PMC: 11735560. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-04807-y.


Defunctioning Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection of Rectum: Morbidity Related to Fashioning and Closure.

Gouvas N, Manatakis D, Agalianos C, Dimitriou N, Baloyiannis I, Tzovaras G Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597049 PMC: 11596492. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111864.


Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.

Dourado J, Rogers P, Horesh N, Emile S, Aeschbacher P, Wexner S Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024; 12:goae052.

PMID: 39036068 PMC: 11259227. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goae052.


Comparing extracorporeal, semi-extracorporeal, and intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: introducing a bridging technique for colorectal surgeons.

Cho H, Kim J, Kim W Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024; 107(1):42-49.

PMID: 38978687 PMC: 11227917. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.1.42.


Preoperative risk factors and cumulative incidence of temporary ileostomy non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

He F, Tang C, Yang F, Chen D, Xiong J, Zou Y World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):94.

PMID: 38610000 PMC: 11010286. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03363-z.