» Articles » PMID: 16812243

Stimulus Control of Delayed Matching in Pigeons: Directed Forgetting

Overview
Date 1981 Sep 1
PMID 16812243
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons were trained in delayed matching-to-sample with two postsample stimuli. A postsample R-cue signaled that a matching choice phase would follow. A postsample F-cue signaled that a matching choice phase would not follow. Previous research found reduced matching accuracy on F-cued probe trials when comparison stimuli were presented in the choice phase. The present four experiments systematically varied the events following an F-cue to determine the conditions under which the F-cue reduces delayed-matching accuracy. When F-cues and R-cues controlled different behavior, matching on probe trials was poor. When both cues controlled the same behavior, matching on probe trials was good. This result is best explained by the theory that comparison stimuli retrieve the sample representation, but only in the behavioral context established by the R-cue. The present research supports the view that response-produced stimuli serve a contextual role in animal short-term memory.

Citing Articles

Comparative Cognition Research Demonstrates the Similarity between Humans and Other Animals.

Zentall T Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37048420 PMC: 10093641. DOI: 10.3390/ani13071165.


Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Brown E, Hampton R Learn Behav. 2020; 48(4):444-452.

PMID: 32638291 PMC: 7686054. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00432-7.


Crows control working memory before and after stimulus encoding.

Fongaro E, Rose J Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3253.

PMID: 32094457 PMC: 7039964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59975-4.


Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Brady R, Hampton R Curr Biol. 2018; 28(24):3903-3910.e3.

PMID: 30503618 PMC: 6501570. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.025.


Control of Working Memory in Rhesus Monkeys ().

Tu H, Hampton R J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014; 40(4):467-476.

PMID: 25436219 PMC: 4243171. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000030.


References
1.
Carter D, Werner T . Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(3):565-601. PMC: 1332854. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565. View

2.
Shimp C . Organization in memory and behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976; 26(1):113-30. PMC: 1333494. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-113. View

3.
Shimp C, Moffitt M . Short-term memory in the pigeon: stimulus-response associations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(3):507-12. PMC: 1333299. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-507. View

4.
GRAYSON R, Wasserman E . Conditioning of two-response patterns of key pecking in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 31(1):23-9. PMC: 1332786. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-23. View

5.
Blough D . Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959; 2:151-60. PMC: 1403892. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151. View