» Articles » PMID: 16812042

Warmup in Avoidance As a Function of Time Since Prior Training

Overview
Date 1978 Jan 1
PMID 16812042
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

On avoidance procedures, rats and pigeons typically show warmup effects, characterized by improving performance within sessions and loss of the improvement ("warmup decrement") between sessions. Between-session losses were examined by varying the time between periods of avoidance training. In one experiment, rats lived fulltime in conditioning chambers while intermission intervals were varied. In a second experiment, the animals lived in home cages between sessions; timeout intervals were introduced at midession, producing recurrence of warmup in the second half-session. In both experiments, the warmup decrements increased substantially as the timeout or intersession intervals were increased from zero to 30 minutes. With intervals of 60 or 120 minutes, the decrements approached or exceeded those obtained with intervals of a day or more. When avoidance was interposed between appetitive sessions, the appetitive responding was disrupted, but this seemed unrelated to the warmup or to the proficiency of avoidance. The warmup in avoidance shares characteristics with transient punishment effects, with the Kamin effect, and with habituation phenomena, but it is premature to assume that they reflect common processes.

Citing Articles

Inhibited Personality Temperaments Translated Through Enhanced Avoidance and Associative Learning Increase Vulnerability for PTSD.

Allen M, Myers C, Beck K, Pang K, Servatius R Front Psychol. 2019; 10:496.

PMID: 30967806 PMC: 6440249. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00496.


Absence of "Warm-Up" during Active Avoidance Learning in a Rat Model of Anxiety Vulnerability: Insights from Computational Modeling.

Myers C, Smith I, Servatius R, Beck K Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8:283.

PMID: 25183956 PMC: 4135546. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00283.


Remote effects of aversive contingencies: Disruption of appetitive behavior by adjacent avoidance sessions.

Hackenberg T, Hineline P J Exp Anal Behav. 1987; 48(1):161-73.

PMID: 16812486 PMC: 1338750. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-161.


Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Mellitz M, Hineline P, Whitehouse W, Laurence M J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 40(1):57-67.

PMID: 16812337 PMC: 1347844. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-57.


Reduction of shock duration as negative reinforcement in free-operant avoidance.

Bersh P, Alloy L J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 33(2):265-73.

PMID: 16812168 PMC: 1332932. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-265.


References
1.
Hake D, Azrin N, Oxford R . The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(1):95-107. PMC: 1338325. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-95. View

2.
Powell R, Peck S . Running-wheel activity and avoidance in the mongolian gerbil. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(5):779-87. PMC: 1338681. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-779. View

3.
Foree D, Lolordo V . Transfer of control of the pigeon's key peck from food reinforcement to avoidance of shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(2):251-9. PMC: 1333267. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-251. View

4.
de Villiers P . The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 21(2):223-35. PMC: 1333190. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-223. View

5.
Klein M, Rilling M . Generalization of free-operant avoidance behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 21(1):75-88. PMC: 1333171. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-75. View