» Articles » PMID: 16811401

Running-wheel Activity and Avoidance in the Mongolian Gerbil

Overview
Date 1969 Sep 1
PMID 16811401
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the first of two experiments, running-wheel activity and unsignaled (Sidman) avoidance were studied in gerbils and albino rats. All gerbils ran at higher rates than any of the four rats studied. Under the avoidance procedure, four rats developed effective responding; the other two performed much less successfully. While avoidance developed more slowly in the gerbils, all showed asymptotic performance as effective as the four superior rats. The rats showed a consistent warm-up effect, receiving 60% to 80% of the total shocks in the initial third of the session. The gerbils displayed no warm-up, with shocks being evenly distributed over the session. Warm-up in the rats was not related to either response rate or to how effectively the animal was avoiding. When shock was removed, extinction occurred more rapidly in the rats than the gerbils. In the second experiment, which involved two-way shuttle avoidance, gerbils and albino mice quickly acquired the response. All animals met a criterion of 90% avoidance over 80 trials.

Citing Articles

Warmup in avoidance as a function of time since prior training.

Hineline P J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(1):87-103.

PMID: 16812042 PMC: 1332811. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-87.


Shock intensity and duration interactions on free-operant avoidance behavior.

Leander J J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 19(3):481-90.

PMID: 16811678 PMC: 1334143. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-481.


The effect of shock intensity upon responding under a multiple-avoidance schedule.

Powell R J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 14(3):321-9.

PMID: 16811479 PMC: 1333743. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-321.


An olfactory discrimination procedure for mice.

Mihalick S, Langlois J, Krienke J, Dube W J Exp Anal Behav. 2000; 73(3):305-18.

PMID: 10866354 PMC: 1284779. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-305.


Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

McSweeney F, Roll J J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(3):621-40.

PMID: 8283153 PMC: 1322170. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621.


References
1.
Powell R, Morris G . A comparison of escape and avoidance conditioning in wild and domesticated rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(4):473-8. PMC: 1338511. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-473. View

2.
Sidman M . Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953; 46(4):253-61. DOI: 10.1037/h0060730. View

3.
Hoffman H, FLESHLER M, CHORNY H . Discriminated bar-press avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:309-16. PMC: 1404156. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-309. View

4.
Moyer K, Korn J . EFFECT OF UCS INTENSITY ON THE ACQUISITION AND EXTINCTION OF AN AVOIDANCE RESPONSE. J Exp Psychol. 1964; 67:352-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0039933. View