» Articles » PMID: 16811408

Density and Delay of Punishment of Free-operant Avoidance

Overview
Date 1969 Nov 1
PMID 16811408
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In two experiments, the free-operant shock-avoidance behavior of rats was punished by electric shock. Two aspects of the schedule of response-produced shock were varied: the frequency of punishment over time (punishment density) and the temporal interval between the punished response and the punishment (punishment delay). The general finding was that response-produced shock suppressed avoidance responding under most of the density-delay combinations studied, and suppression increased as a function of increases in density and decreases in delay. Rate increases of small magnitude also were observed, usually as an initial reaction to the lesser densities and longer delays. Response suppression, while decreasing the number of punishment shocks received, also increased the number of avoidance shocks, so that the total number of shocks received usually was greater than the minimal number possible. The results were discussed from the standpoint of similarities between the effects of punishing positively and negatively reinforced behavior. The finding that subjects did not minimize the total number of shocks suggested that when avoidance behavior is punished, responding is controlled more by the local consequences of responding than by overall shock frequencies during the course of the session.

Citing Articles

An approach to identifying the conditions under which response interruption will reduce automatically reinforced problem behavior.

Kliebert M, Tiger J, Toussaint K Behav Anal Pract. 2012; 4(1):17-26.

PMID: 22532900 PMC: 3196201. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391771.


The effects of delayed reinforcement on free-operant responding.

Weil J J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 41(2):143-55.

PMID: 16812363 PMC: 1348028. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-143.


Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Hineline P J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 14(3):259-68.

PMID: 16811473 PMC: 1333732. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-259.


On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Lerman D, Vorndran C J Appl Behav Anal. 2003; 35(4):431-64.

PMID: 12555918 PMC: 1284409. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-431.


Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Dinsmoor J J Exp Anal Behav. 2001; 75(3):311-33.

PMID: 11453621 PMC: 1284820. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-311.


References
1.
McKearney J . Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock-presentation. Science. 1968; 160(3833):1249-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3833.1249. View

2.
McIntire R, Davis H, COHEN S, Franch E . Sidman avoidance performance under punishment and non-contingent shock conditions. Psychol Rep. 1968; 22(3):897-903. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1968.22.3.897. View

3.
CAMP D, RAYMOND G, Church R . Temporal relationship between response and punishment. J Exp Psychol. 1967; 74(1):114-23. DOI: 10.1037/h0024518. View

4.
Sidman M . Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953; 46(4):253-61. DOI: 10.1037/h0060730. View

5.
Baron A . DELAYED PUNISHMENT OF A RUNWAY RESPONSE. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965; 60:131-4. DOI: 10.1037/h0022326. View