» Articles » PMID: 12555918

On the Status of Knowledge for Using Punishment Implications for Treating Behavior Disorders

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2003 Jan 31
PMID 12555918
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, we review basic and applied findings on punishment and discuss the importance of conducting further research in this area. The characteristics of responding during punishment and numerous factors that interact with basic processes are delineated in conjunction with implications for the treatment of behavior disorders in clinical populations. We conclude that further understanding of punishment processes is needed to develop a highly systematic, effective technology of behavior change, including strategies for improving the efficacy of less intrusive procedures and for successfully fading treatment.

Citing Articles

A Quantitative Systematic Literature Review of Combination Punishment Literature: Progress Over the Last Decade.

Ayvaci A, Cox A, Dimopoulos A Behav Modif. 2024; 49(1):117-153.

PMID: 39056439 PMC: 11571620. DOI: 10.1177/01454455241262414.


A Discussion of Positive Behavior Support and Applied Behavior Analysis in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the UK and Ireland.

Stalford D, Graham S, Keenan M Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(2):442-455.

PMID: 38966271 PMC: 11219608. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00905-x.


Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.

Hurd A, Brown K, Randall K Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(1):139-166.

PMID: 38660499 PMC: 11035527. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1.


Report of the ABAI Task Force on Contingent Electric Skin Shock.

Perone M, Lerman D, Peterson S, Williams D Perspect Behav Sci. 2023; 46(2):261-304.

PMID: 37425985 PMC: 10323060. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-023-00379-w.


Teaching the History of Applied Behavior Analysis.

Morris C, Peterson S Perspect Behav Sci. 2023; 45(4):757-774.

PMID: 36618561 PMC: 9712893. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00354-x.


References
1.
Charlop M, Burgio L, Iwata B, Ivancic M . Stimulus variation as a means of enhancing punishment effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988; 21(1):89-95. PMC: 1286097. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-89. View

2.
Piazza C, Adelinis J, Hanley G, Goh H, Delia M . An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(1):13-27. PMC: 1284219. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-13. View

3.
Orme-Johnson D, Yarczower M . Conditioned suppression, punishment, and aversion. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 21(1):57-74. PMC: 1333170. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-57. View

4.
McMillan D . A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(5):439-49. PMC: 1338408. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-439. View

5.
BANKS R . Intermittent punishment effect (IPE) sustained through changed stimulus conditions and through blocks of nonpunished trials. J Exp Psychol. 1967; 73(3):456-60. DOI: 10.1037/h0024293. View