» Articles » PMID: 33844588

What's Wrong with This Picture? A Critical Review of Current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Criteria for Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33844588
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes populations. However, the eligibility criteria for CGM coverage required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) ignore conclusive evidence that supports CGM use in various diabetes populations that are currently deemed ineligible. This article discusses the limitations and inconsistencies of the CMS eligibility criteria relative to current scientific evidence and proposes workable solutions to address this issue and improve the safety and care of all individuals with diabetes.

Citing Articles

Expanding Access to Continuous Glucose Monitoring Through Empowering Primary Care: A Joint Endocrinology-Primary Care Quality Improvement Project.

Flint K, Fiore M, Justice A, Carney J, Colling C, Li J J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40032724 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09449-y.


Best practices and rationale for expanding Medicaid access to continuous glucose monitoring.

King C, Lilly A J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024; 30(10-b Suppl):S40-S49.

PMID: 39347971 PMC: 11443979. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s40.


Innovation is the driver behind quality improvements in diabetes care delivery.

Hirsch I, Parkin C J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024; 30(10-b Suppl):S2-S6.

PMID: 39347969 PMC: 11443978. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s2.


Benchmarking Diabetes Technology Use Among 21 U.S. Pediatric Diabetes Centers.

Prahalad P, Hardison H, Odugbesan O, Lyons S, Alwazeer M, Neyman A Clin Diabetes. 2024; 42(1):27-33.

PMID: 38230344 PMC: 10788667. DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0052.


Assessment and prevention of hypoglycaemia in primary care among U.S. Veterans: a mixed methods study.

Pilla S, Meza K, Beach M, Long J, Gordon H, Bates J Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023; 28:100641.

PMID: 38076413 PMC: 10701452. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100641.


References
1.
Khunti K, Alsifri S, Aronson R, Cigrovski Berkovic M, Enters-Weijnen C, Forsen T . Impact of hypoglycaemia on patient-reported outcomes from a global, 24-country study of 27,585 people with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 130:121-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.05.004. View

2.
Paris I, Henry C, Pirard F, Gerard A, Colin I . The new FreeStyle libre flash glucose monitoring system improves the glycaemic control in a cohort of people with type 1 diabetes followed in real-life conditions over a period of one year. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019; 1(3):e00023. PMC: 6354746. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.23. View

3.
McGill J, Wu M, Pop-Busui R, Mizokami-Stout K, Tamborlane W, Aleppo G . Biologic and social factors predict incident kidney disease in type 1 diabetes: Results from the T1D exchange clinic network. J Diabetes Complications. 2019; 33(10):107400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.06.005. View

4.
Huynh P, Toulouse A, Hirsch I . ONE-YEAR TIME ANALYSIS IN AN ACADEMIC DIABETES CLINIC: QUANTIFYING OUR BURDEN. Endocr Pract. 2018; 24(5):489-491. DOI: 10.4158/EP-2017-0267. View

5.
Majithia A, Kusiak C, Lee A, Colangelo F, Romanelli R, Robertson S . Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in a Continuous Glucose Monitor-Driven Virtual Diabetes Clinic: Prospective Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e21778. PMC: 7486672. DOI: 10.2196/21778. View