» Articles » PMID: 16799308

Analysis of Velopharyngeal Morphology in Adults with Velopharyngeal Incompetence After Surgery of a Cleft Palate

Overview
Journal Ann Plast Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2006 Jun 27
PMID 16799308
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship of velopharyngeal morphology and velopharyngeal function among 13 adults with velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI), 14 adults with velopharyngeal competence (VPC) after primary surgical treatment of cleft palate, and 20 noncleft adults. The measurements included velar length, pharyngeal depth, pharyngeal height, and the need ratio of pharyngeal depth to velar length. In addition, the cranial base, cervical vertebrae, posterior nasal spine, and also the position of the posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) in the pharyngeal triangle were analyzed. All data were subjected to the Student t test of statistical significance. The results showed that the VPI group had normal pharyngeal depth and a significantly shorter velar length, resulting in a greater depth/length ratio than those of the VPC group and normal control subjects. The position of PPW in the pharyngeal triangle was located significantly more superior in the VPI group compared with the VPC group and normal control subjects. Measurements of the anteroposterior and the vertical dimensions in the regions of the cranial base and cervical vertebrae revealed no significant difference among the 3 groups. According to this study, the velopharyngeal morphology of adults with VPI is characterized by a shorter palate, greater need ratio, slightly counterclockwise-rotated pharyngeal triangle, and superiorly positioned PPW.

Citing Articles

Achieving Clinical Success in Nonsedated Velopharyngeal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Optimizing Data Quality and Patient Selection.

Mason K, Gampper T, Black J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 155(3):562e-572e.

PMID: 38991113 PMC: 11845073. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011619.


Measurement Matters: MRI Analysis of Differing Anatomic Measurement Techniques for Velar Length and the Velopharyngeal Needs Ratio.

Mason K, Hanson B, Black J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(2):e5617.

PMID: 38375369 PMC: 10876255. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005617.


Does Distraction Lower Risk of VPI Compared to Conventional Maxillary Advancement? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Adolescents with Cleft Palate.

Kinter S, Susarla S, Delaney J, Chapman K, Kapadia H, Weiss N Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022; 61(3):422-432.

PMID: 36373608 PMC: 10752384. DOI: 10.1177/10556656221138895.


Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4- to 9-year old children using magnetic resonance imaging.

Perry J, Kollara L, Kuehn D, Sutton B, Fang X Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021; 55(1):21-34.

PMID: 33948051 PMC: 8092075. DOI: 10.1177/1055665617718549.


Effective Velopharyngeal Ratio: A More Clinically Relevant Measure of Velopharyngeal Function.

Haenssler A, Fang X, Perry J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(11):3586-3593.

PMID: 32976083 PMC: 8582755. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00305.