» Articles » PMID: 16784287

Differences Between the Internal Energy Depositions Induced by Collisional Activation and by Electron Transfer of W(CO)6(2+) Ions on Collision with Ar and K Targets

Overview
Journal J Chem Phys
Specialties Biophysics
Chemistry
Date 2006 Jun 21
PMID 16784287
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Doubly charged tungsten hexacarbonyl W(CO)(6) (2+) ions were made to collide with Ar and K targets to give singly and doubly charged positive ions by collision-induced dissociation (CID). The resulting ions were analyzed and detected by using a spherical electrostatic analyzer. Whereas the doubly charged fragment ions resulting from collisional activation (CA) were dominant with the Ar target, singly charged fragment ions resulting from electron transfer were dominant with the K target. The internal energy deposition in collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) evaluated with the Ar target was broad and decreased with increasing internal energy. The predominant peaks observed with the K target were associated with singly charged W(CO)(2) (+) and W(CO)(3) (+) ions: these ions were not the result of CA, but arose from dissociation induced by electron transfer (DIET). The internal energy deposition resulting from the electron transfer was very narrow and centered at a particular energy, 7.8 eV below the energy level of the W(CO)(6) (2+) ion. This narrow internal energy distribution was explained in terms of electron transfer by Landau-Zener potential crossing at a separation of 5.9 x 10(-8) cm between a W(CO)(6) (2+) ion and a K atom, and the coulombic repulsion between singly charged ions in the exit channel. A large cross section of 1.1 x 10(-14) cm(2) was estimated for electron capture of the doubly charged W(CO)(6) (2+) ion from the alkali metal target, whose ionization energy is very low. The term "collision-induced dissociation," taken literally, includes all dissociation processes induced by collision, and therefore encompasses both CAD and DIET processes in the present work. Although the terms CID and CAD have been defined similarly, we would like to propose that they should not be used interchangeably, on the basis that there are differences in the observed ions and in their intensities with Ar and K targets.

Citing Articles

Energy Dispersion in Pyridinium-Water Nanodroplets upon Irradiation.

Bertier P, Lavy L, Comte D, Feketeova L, Salbaing T, Azuma T ACS Omega. 2022; 7(12):10235-10242.

PMID: 35382340 PMC: 8973082. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06842.


Impact of a hydrophobic ion on the early stage of atmospheric aerosol formation.

Feketeova L, Bertier P, Salbaing T, Azuma T, Calvo F, Farizon B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(45):22540-22544.

PMID: 31636185 PMC: 6842599. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911136116.


Study of Ion Dynamics by Electron Transfer Dissociation: Alkali Metals as Targets.

Hayakawa S Mass Spectrom (Tokyo). 2017; 6(1):A0062.

PMID: 28966899 PMC: 5613145. DOI: 10.5702/massspectrometry.A0062.


Velocity of a Molecule Evaporated from a Water Nanodroplet: Maxwell-Boltzmann Statistics versus Non-Ergodic Events.

Abdoul-Carime H, Berthias F, Feketeova L, Marciante M, Calvo F, Forquet V Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015; 54(49):14685-9.

PMID: 26473406 PMC: 4678507. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201505890.


High-energy electron transfer dissociation (HE-ETD) using alkali metal targets for sequence analysis of post-translational peptides.

Hayakawa S, Matsumoto S, Hashimoto M, Iwamoto K, Nagao H, Toyoda M J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010; 21(9):1482-9.

PMID: 20598903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.05.010.