» Articles » PMID: 16783027

Statistical Analysis of Pathogenicity of Somatic Mutations in Cancer

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Jun 20
PMID 16783027
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent large-scale sequencing studies have revealed that cancer genomes contain variable numbers of somatic point mutations distributed across many genes. These somatic mutations most likely include passenger mutations that are not cancer causing and pathogenic driver mutations in cancer genes. Establishing a significant presence of driver mutations in such data sets is of biological interest. Whereas current techniques from phylogeny are applicable to large data sets composed of singly mutated samples, recently exemplified with a p53 mutation database, methods for smaller data sets containing individual samples with multiple mutations need to be developed. By constructing distinct models of both the mutation process and selection pressure upon the cancer samples, exact statistical tests to examine this problem are devised. Tests to examine the significance of selection toward missense, nonsense, and splice site mutations are derived, along with tests assessing variation in selection between functional domains. Maximum-likelihood methods facilitate parameter estimation, including levels of selection pressure and minimum numbers of pathogenic mutations. These methods are illustrated with 25 breast cancers screened across the coding sequences of 518 kinase genes, revealing 90 base substitutions in 71 genes. Significant selection pressure upon truncating mutations was established. Furthermore, an estimated minimum of 29.8 mutations were pathogenic.

Citing Articles

Analysis of 1386 epileptogenic brain lesions reveals association with DYRK1A and EGFR.

Bosselmann C, Leu C, Brunger T, Hoffmann L, Baldassari S, Chipaux M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10429.

PMID: 39616148 PMC: 11608322. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54911-w.


Somatic mutation rates scale with time not growth rate in long-lived tropical trees.

Satake A, Imai R, Fujino T, Tomimoto S, Ohta K, Naiem M Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39441734 PMC: 11498935. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88456.


Mitochondrial DNA mosaicism in normal human somatic cells.

An J, Nam C, Kim R, Lee Y, Won H, Park S Nat Genet. 2024; 56(8):1665-1677.

PMID: 39039280 PMC: 11319206. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01838-z.


The molecular map of CLL and Richter's syndrome.

Sud A, Parry E, Wu C Semin Hematol. 2024; 61(2):73-82.

PMID: 38368146 PMC: 11653080. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.01.009.


A Mouse-Specific Model to Detect Genes under Selection in Tumors.

Chen H, Shu J, Maley C, Liu L Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(21).

PMID: 37958330 PMC: 10647215. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215156.


References
1.
Valverde J, Alonso J, Palacios I, Pestana A . RB1 gene mutation up-date, a meta-analysis based on 932 reported mutations available in a searchable database. BMC Genet. 2005; 6:53. PMC: 1298292. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-53. View

2.
Davies H, Bignell G, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S . Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002; 417(6892):949-54. DOI: 10.1038/nature00766. View

3.
Beroud C, Soussi T . The UMD-p53 database: new mutations and analysis tools. Hum Mutat. 2003; 21(3):176-81. DOI: 10.1002/humu.10187. View

4.
Little M, Wright E . A stochastic carcinogenesis model incorporating genomic instability fitted to colon cancer data. Math Biosci. 2003; 183(2):111-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(03)00040-3. View

5.
Stephens P, Edkins S, Davies H, Greenman C, Cox C, Hunter C . A screen of the complete protein kinase gene family identifies diverse patterns of somatic mutations in human breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2005; 37(6):590-2. DOI: 10.1038/ng1571. View