» Articles » PMID: 16779809

Variations in the Structure of the Prelunate Gyrus in Old World Monkeys

Overview
Date 2006 Jun 17
PMID 16779809
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anatomical and electrophysiological studies have revealed a complex organization in the macaque prelunate gyrus. We investigated the morphology and architecture of the prelunate gyrus in Old World monkeys. In Macaca nemestrina, we observed a sulcus crossing the prelunate gyrus within 2 mm of the vertical meridian representation. In other macaque species and other cercopithecines, we observed substantial variations in sulcal morphology across the prelunate gyrus. We did not find a sulcus in all species, and the location and depth of that indentation on the gyrus varied among species. A deep sulcus was observed in all species that emerged earlier in evolution than macaques, such as guenons, baboons, and colobines. We analyzed the regional and parcellation features of the prelunate gyrus in three macaque species, M. maura, M. mulatta, and M. radiata, and in Erythrocebus patas, with emphasis on the relation of structure to the distribution of prelunate visual areas. Nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein immunoreactivity permitted the delineation of a novel area in the prelunate gyrus of Old World monkeys, located around the prelunate sulcus. Species-specific patterns were also observed in the prelunate gyrus of the patas monkey compared to macaques. These observations, as well as a cladistic analysis of the data, suggest an expanded and diversified organization of the prelunate gyrus in some cercopithecoids that may reflect adaptation to specific ecological environments. It was, however, progressively lost in most macaques, being retained only in species that diverged early in the evolution of the genus Macaca, such as M. nemestrina and M. maura.

Citing Articles

Glycine is a transmitter in the human and chimpanzee cochlear nuclei.

Baizer J, Sherwood C, Hof P, Baker J, Witelson S Front Neuroanat. 2024; 18:1331230.

PMID: 38425805 PMC: 10902441. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1331230.


Comparative analysis of four nuclei in the human brainstem: Individual differences, left-right asymmetry, species differences.

Baizer J, Witelson S Front Neuroanat. 2023; 17:1069210.

PMID: 36874056 PMC: 9978016. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1069210.


MRI-based Parcellation and Morphometry of the Individual Rhesus Monkey Brain: the macaque Harvard-Oxford Atlas (mHOA), a translational system referencing a standardized ontology.

Rushmore R, Bouix S, Kubicki M, Rathi Y, Rosene D, Yeterian E Brain Imaging Behav. 2020; 15(3):1589-1621.

PMID: 32960419 PMC: 8608281. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00357-9.


Normative Analysis of Individual Brain Differences Based on a Population MRI-Based Atlas of Cynomolgus Macaques.

Lv Q, Yan M, Shen X, Wu J, Yu W, Yan S Cereb Cortex. 2020; 31(1):341-355.

PMID: 32844170 PMC: 7727342. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa229.


Submillimeter fMRI reveals a layout of dorsal visual cortex in macaques, remarkably similar to New World monkeys.

Zhu Q, Vanduffel W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):2306-2311.

PMID: 30674668 PMC: 6369784. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805561116.


References
1.
Catania K, Lyon D, Mock O, Kaas J . Cortical organization in shrews: evidence from five species. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 410(1):55-72. View

2.
WELKER W, SEIDENSTEIN S . Somatic sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of the racoon (Procyon lotor). J Comp Neurol. 1959; 111:469-501. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901110306. View

3.
Raaum R, Sterner K, Noviello C, Stewart C, Disotell T . Catarrhine primate divergence dates estimated from complete mitochondrial genomes: concordance with fossil and nuclear DNA evidence. J Hum Evol. 2005; 48(3):237-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.007. View

4.
Boire D, Desgent S, Matteau I, Ptito M . Regional analysis of neurofilament protein immunoreactivity in the hamster's cortex. J Chem Neuroanat. 2005; 29(3):193-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2005.01.003. View

5.
Sereno M, Tootell R . From monkeys to humans: what do we now know about brain homologies?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(2):135-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.014. View