» Articles » PMID: 16773334

Physiological Responses During a T-piece Weaning Trial with a Deflated Tube

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2006 Jun 15
PMID 16773334
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: T-piece trials and spontaneous breathing trials through the tracheostomy tube are often used as weaning techniques. They are usually performed with the cuff inflated, which may increase the inspiratory load and/or influence the tidal volume generated by the patient. We assessed diaphragmatic effort during T-piece trials with or without cuff inflation.

Settings: Respiratory intensive care unit

Methods: We measured breathing pattern, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the pressure-time product of the diaphragm, per minute (PTPdi/min) and per breath (PTPdi/b), and lung mechanics (lung compliance and resistance) in 13 tracheotomized patients ready for a weaning trial. V(T) was recorded with respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP-V(T)) or pneumotachography PT-V(T)). Patients completed two T-piece trials of 30[Symbol: see text]min each with or without the cuff inflated.

Results: RIP-V(T) and PT-V(T) values were similar with the cuff inflated, but PT-V(T) significantly underestimated RIP-V(T) when the cuff was deflated, and therefore the RIP-V(T) was chosen as the reference method. The RIP-V(T) was significantly greater and the Pdi and PTPdi/min significantly lower when the cuff was deflated than when it was inflated. The efficiency of the diaphragm, calculated by the ratio of PTPdi/b over RIP-V(T), was also improved, while no changes were observed in lung mechanics.

Conclusions: Diaphragmatic effort is significantly lower during a T-piece trial with a deflated cuff than when the cuff is inflated, while RIP-V(T) is higher, so that the diaphragm's efficiency in generating tidal volume is also improved.

Citing Articles

Effect of aggressive vs conservative screening and confirmatory test on time to extubation among patients at low or intermediate risk: a randomized clinical trial.

Martinez G, Rodriguez P, Soto J, Caritg O, Castellvi-Font A, Mariblanca B Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(2):258-267.

PMID: 38353714 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07330-w.


Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

Whitmore K, Townsend S, Laupland K BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020; 7(1).

PMID: 32723731 PMC: 7390235. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000651.


[Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Weaning categories and weaning concepts].

Geiseler J, Kelbel C Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016; 111(3):208-14.

PMID: 27084181 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-016-0147-y.


Respiratory management in the patient with spinal cord injury.

Vazquez R, Rascado Sedes P, Farina M, Montoto Marques A, Ferreiro Velasco M Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:168757.

PMID: 24089664 PMC: 3781830. DOI: 10.1155/2013/168757.

References
1.
Smith J, Bellemare F . Effect of lung volume on in vivo contraction characteristics of human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987; 62(5):1893-900. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.5.1893. View

2.
Chadda K, Louis B, Benaissa L, Annane D, Gajdos P, Raphael J . Physiological effects of decannulation in tracheostomized patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28(12):1761-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1545-6. View

3.
Petrof B, Legare M, Goldberg P, Milic-Emili J, Gottfried S . Continuous positive airway pressure reduces work of breathing and dyspnea during weaning from mechanical ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990; 141(2):281-9. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.2.281. View

4.
Cavo J, OGURA J, SESSIONS D, Nelson J . Flow resistance in tracheotomy tubes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1973; 82(6):827-30. DOI: 10.1177/000348947308200614. View

5.
Appendini L, Purro A, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Spada E . Partitioning of inspiratory muscle workload and pressure assistance in ventilator-dependent COPD patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154(5):1301-9. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912740. View