Effect of Aggressive Vs Conservative Screening and Confirmatory Test on Time to Extubation Among Patients at Low or Intermediate Risk: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the best strategy to achieve fast and safe extubation.
Methods: This multicenter trial randomized patients with primary respiratory failure and low-to-intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) preventive therapy. It included four groups: (1) conservative screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ≥ 150 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≤ 8 cmHO plus conservative spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with pressure support 5 cmHO + PEEP 0 cmHO); (2) screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 plus aggressive SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (3) aggressive screening with PaO/FiO > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (4) screening with PaO/FiO > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 5 + PEEP 0. Primary outcomes were time-to-extubation and simple weaning rate. Secondary outcomes included reintubation within 7 days after extubation.
Results: Randomization to the aggressive-aggressive group was discontinued at the interim analysis for safety reasons. Thus, 884 patients who underwent at least 1 SBT were analyzed (conservative-conservative group, n = 256; conservative-aggressive group, n = 267; aggressive-conservative group, n = 261; aggressive-aggressive, n = 100). Median time to extubation was lower in the groups with aggressive screening (p < 0.001). Simple weaning rates were 45.7%, 76.78% (205 patients), 71.65%, and 91% (p < 0.001), respectively. Reintubation rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.431).
Conclusion: Among patients at low or intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned HFNC, combining aggressive screening with preventive PEEP and a conservative SBT reduced the time to extubation without increasing the reintubation rate.
Best clinical model predicting extubation failure: a diagnostic accuracy post hoc analysis.
Rodriguez Villamizar P, Thille A, Doblas M, Frat J, Leal Sanz P, Alonso E Intensive Care Med. 2025; 51(1):106-114.
PMID: 39774863 PMC: 11787151. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07758-0.
Fonseca C, Novoa C, Aguayo M, Arriagada R, Alvarado C, Pedreros C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).
PMID: 39451587 PMC: 11505932. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202263.
Jaber S, Pensier J, Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Seguin P, Ferrandiere M Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(8):1265-1274.
PMID: 39073580 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07522-4.
Weaning strategy in patients at low-to-medium risk of extubation failure. Author's reply.
Hernandez G, Rodriguez P Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(6):999-1000.
PMID: 38619608 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07427-2.
Weaning strategy in patients at low-to-medium risk of extubation failure.
Jha A Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(6):997-998.
PMID: 38598129 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07418-3.