Oculomotor Evidence of Sequence Learning on the Serial Reaction Time Task

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 2006 Jun 7

PMID 16752605

Citations 27

Authors

David J Marcus

Canan Karatekin

Steven Markiewicz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Manual and oculomotor measures of sequence learning were examined on the serial reaction time (SRT) task Participants were assigned into four groups differing on response modality (manual, oculomotor) and trial type (sequence, pseudorandom). The pattern of manual RTs replicated previous studies. Frequency of anticipatory eye movements followed similar patterns as RTs. Participants made many anticipations, even in pseudorandom blocks, and frequency of anticipations did not depend on presence of concurrent manual responses. Excluding participants with explicit awareness did not change results. Anticipations were negatively related to RTs in both incidental and intentional learning. Anticipations were positively related to sequence recall in intentional, but not incidental, learning. Results suggest that (1) anticipatory eye movements reflected sequence learning and (2) participants made overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention to likely stimulus locations prior to stimulus onset, whether or not they made manual responses and whether or not there was a sequence.

Citing Articles

On the interaction between implicit statistical learning and the alternation advantage: Evidence from manual and oculomotor serial reaction time tasks.

Compostella A, Tagliani M, Vender M, Delfitto D PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318638.

PMID: 39913613 PMC: 11801591. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318638.

Oculomotor functional connectivity associated with motor sequence learning.

Rubino C, Andrushko J, Rinat S, Harrison A, Boyd L Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(11).

PMID: 39514340 PMC: 11546180. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae434.

Early Eye Disengagement Is Regulated by Task Complexity and Task Repetition in Visual Tracking Task.

Wu Y, Zhang Z, Aghazadeh F, Zheng B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793839 PMC: 11125091. DOI: 10.3390/s24102984.

Concurrent visual sequence learning.

Wilts S, Haider H Psychol Res. 2023; 87(7):2086-2100.

PMID: 36947194 PMC: 10457409. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01810-2.

Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice.

Dahm S, Rieger M Hum Mov Sci. 2022; 87:103050.

PMID: 36549085 PMC: 7614144. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2022.103050.

References

Wilkinson L, Shanks D . Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004; 30(2):354-69. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.354. View

Ziessler M, Nattkemper D . Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(3):595-613. View

Remillard G . Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(4):581-97. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.581. View

Huettel S, Mack P, McCarthy G . Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(5):485-90. DOI: 10.1038/nn841. View

Buchner A, Steffens M . Simultaneous learning of different regularities in sequence learning tasks: limits and characteristics. Psychol Res. 2001; 65(2):71-80. DOI: 10.1007/s004260000052. View

Tubau E, Lopez-Moliner J . Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge. Psychol Res. 2004; 68(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0139-4. View

Mayr U . Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996; 22(2):350-64. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.2.350. View

Ziessler M . The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychol Res. 1994; 57(1):30-41. DOI: 10.1007/BF00452993. View

Keele S, Ivry R, Mayr U, Hazeltine E, Heuer H . The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(2):316-39. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.316. View

10.

HOWARD Jr J, Mutter S, Howard D . Serial pattern learning by event observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992; 18(5):1029-39. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1029. View

11.

Beldarrain M, Grafman J, Pascual-Leone A, Garcia-Monco J . Procedural learning is impaired in patients with prefrontal lesions. Neurology. 1999; 52(9):1853-60. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.52.9.1853. View

12.

Willingham D . Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Mem Cognit. 1999; 27(3):561-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211549. View

13.

Kawashima R, Tanji J, Okada K, Sugiura M, Sato K, Kinomura S . Oculomotor sequence learning: a positron emission tomography study. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 122(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050485. View

14.

Posner M . Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980; 32(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231. View

15.

Russeler J, Hennighausen E, Munte T, Rosler F . Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 15(2):116-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00145-3. View

16.

Stadler M . On learning complex procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(6):1061-9. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1061. View

17.

Land M, Furneaux S . The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997; 352(1358):1231-9. PMC: 1692006. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0105. View

18.

Lee D . Learning of spatial and temporal patterns in sequential hand movements. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000; 9(1):35-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00040-3. View

19.

Koch I, Hoffmann J . Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychol Res. 2000; 63(1):22-35. DOI: 10.1007/pl00008165. View

20.

Heyes C, Foster C . Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002; 55(2):593-607. DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000389. View