» Articles » PMID: 14752664

Spatial Interference and Response Control in Sequence Learning: the Role of Explicit Knowledge

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2004 Jan 31
PMID 14752664
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In several sequence learning studies it has been suggested that response control shifts from the stimuli to some internal representation (i.e., motor program) through the learning process. The main questions addressed in this paper are whether this control shift is related to explicit knowledge and whether the formation of these internal representations depends on the stimulus attributes. In one experiment we compared the learning of a response sequence triggered by either spatial location or location symbol (left-right) by using a serial response task (SRT). Symbols were presented at either a centered or random location. The results showed that in the symbolic conditions the shift of response control correlated with the emergence of explicit knowledge. Only participants with complete explicit knowledge seemed to learn the sequence structure beyond probabilistic information (response time "RT" did not depend on the frequency of the response). Moreover, these participants were able to overcome, when needed, spatial interference (RT was the same for both spatially corresponding and non-corresponding trials). However, when spatial location was relevant, RT was always faster, especially for more frequent responses. These results suggest that the relevant stimulus dimension (location or symbol) seems to engage different sequence learning mechanisms.

Citing Articles

The interplay between unexpected events and behavior in the development of explicit knowledge in implicit sequence learning.

Lustig C, Esser S, Haider H Psychol Res. 2021; 86(7):2225-2238.

PMID: 34951662 PMC: 9470660. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01630-2.


Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.

Pelzer L, Naefgen C, Gaschler R, Haider H Psychol Res. 2021; 86(3):952-967.

PMID: 33885955 PMC: 8942975. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01518-1.


Isoluminant stimuli in a familiar discrete keying sequence task can be ignored.

Verwey W Psychol Res. 2019; 85(2):793-807.

PMID: 31811366 PMC: 7900095. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01277-0.


Striatal and hippocampal involvement in motor sequence chunking depends on the learning strategy.

Lungu O, Monchi O, Albouy G, Jubault T, Ballarin E, Burnod Y PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e103885.

PMID: 25148078 PMC: 4141721. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103885.


Response-mode shifts during sequence learning of macaque monkeys.

Runger D, Ashby F, Picard N, Strick P Psychol Res. 2011; 77(2):223-33.

PMID: 22159763 PMC: 9437976. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0402-z.


References
1.
Willingham D, Nissen M, Bullemer P . On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(6):1047-60. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1047. View

2.
Mayr U . Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996; 22(2):350-64. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.2.350. View

3.
Lawrence B, Myerson J, Oonk H, Abrams R . The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. Memory. 2001; 9(4-6):433-44. DOI: 10.1080/09658210143000047. View

4.
de Jong R, Liang C, Lauber E . Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(4):731-50. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.731. View

5.
Frensch P, Miner C . Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Mem Cognit. 1994; 22(1):95-110. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202765. View