Morphine-conditioned Single-trial Place Preference: Role of Nucleus Accumbens Shell Dopamine Receptors in Acquisition, but Not Expression

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2006 May 26

PMID 16724186

Citations 41

Authors

Sandro Fenu

Liliana Spina

Emilia Rivas

Rosanna Longoni

Gaetano Di Chiara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: A large body of evidence indicates an involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway innervating the ventral striatum in the motivational effects of drug abuse.

Objective: The goal of the study is to clarify the role of DA D1 and D2 receptors of the rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell and core in the motivational effects of morphine as studied by conditioned place preference (CPP).

Methods: The effect of the intracerebral infusion of DA antagonists specific for DA D1 (SCH 39166) and D2 receptors (L-sulpiride) was studied in a single-trial place conditioning paradigm with fixed assignment of the drug to the unpreferred compartment.

Results: Morphine induced significant CPP at all the doses tested (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously). A dose of 1.0 mg/kg was selected for further studies. Intra-NAc shell infusion of SCH 39166 and L-sulpiride at doses of 25 and 50 ng/1 microl per side impaired the acquisition of CPP by morphine. No effect was observed at 12.5 ng/1 microl per side. Intra-NAc core infusion of SCH 39166 (12.5, 25, and 50 ng/1 microl per side) did not affect the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP, while L-sulpiride (12.5, 25, and 50 ng/1 microl per side) impaired CPP acquisition only at the dose of 50 ng/1 microl per side. No effect on morphine-induced CPP was observed when the DA antagonists were infused into the NAc shell or core 10 min before the test session.

Conclusion: These results indicate that DA D1 and D2 receptors in the NAc shell are involved in the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP.

Citing Articles

Hippocampal Lesions in Male Rats Produce Retrograde Memory Loss for Over-Trained Spatial Memory but Do Not Impact Appetitive-Contextual Memory: Implications for Theories of Memory Organization in the Mammalian Brain.

Hong N, Lee J, Bonifacio C, Gibb M, Kent M, Nixon A J Neurosci Res. 2025; 103(1):e70013.

PMID: 39743833 PMC: 11694058. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.70013.

Interactions of pain and opioids on conditioned place preference in rodents.

Barattini A, Pahng A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 242(1):1-26.

PMID: 39562334 PMC: 11741919. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06719-1.

Nucleus accumbens sub-regions experience distinct dopamine release responses following acute and chronic morphine exposure.

Gooding S, Lewis E, Chau C, Sandhu S, Glienke J, Whistler J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39005415 PMC: 11244850. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.28.601282.

Knockout of Dopamine D3 Receptor Gene Blocked Methamphetamine-Induced Distinct Changes of Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Synapse in the Nucleus Accumbens Shell of Mice.

Wang S, Li M, Su L, Wang Y, Ma D, Wang H Front Cell Neurosci. 2022; 16:893190.

PMID: 35711471 PMC: 9195588. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.893190.

Morphine reduces the interest for natural rewards.

Piccin A, Courtand G, Contarino A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022; 239(8):2407-2419.

PMID: 35396673 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-022-06131-7.

References

Robbins T, Cador M, Taylor J, Everitt B . Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1989; 13(2-3):155-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(89)80025-9. View

Cunningham C, Ferree N, Howard M . Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 170(4):409-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1559-y. View

Tzschentke T . Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol. 1999; 56(6):613-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00060-4. View

Shippenberg T, Herz A . Examination of the neurochemical substrates mediating the motivational effects of opioids: role of the mesolimbic dopamine system and D-1 vs. D-2 dopamine receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 265(1):53-9. View

Carboni E, Acquas E, Leone P, Di Chiara G . 5HT3 receptor antagonists block morphine- and nicotine- but not amphetamine-induced reward. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989; 97(2):175-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00442245. View

Leone P, Di Chiara G . Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine- and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987; 135(2):251-4. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90621-2. View

Bardo M, Neisewander J . Chronic naltrexone supersensitizes the reinforcing and locomotor-activating effects of morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987; 28(2):267-73. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90224-3. View

Schwartz A, Marchok P . Depression of morphine-seeking behaviour by dopamine inhibition. Nature. 1974; 248(445):257-8. DOI: 10.1038/248257a0. View

McFarland K, Ettenberg A . Haloperidol does not affect motivational processes in an operant runway model of food-seeking behavior. Behav Neurosci. 1998; 112(3):630-5. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.112.3.630. View

10.

Mucha R, van der Kooy D, OShaughnessy M, Bucenieks P . Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Res. 1982; 243(1):91-105. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91123-4. View

11.

Bardo M, Neisewander J, Miller J . Repeated testing attenuates conditioned place preference with cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986; 89(2):239-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00310636. View

12.

Di Chiara G, Imperato A . Opposite effects of mu and kappa opiate agonists on dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens and in the dorsal caudate of freely moving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988; 244(3):1067-80. View

13.

Dickinson A, Smith J, Mirenowicz J . Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists. Behav Neurosci. 2000; 114(3):468-83. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.114.3.468. View

14.

Di Chiara G, Morelli M, Consolo S . Modulatory functions of neurotransmitters in the striatum: ACh/dopamine/NMDA interactions. Trends Neurosci. 1994; 17(6):228-33. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90005-1. View

15.

Shippenberg T, Herz A . Motivational effects of opioids: influence of D-1 versus D-2 receptor antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988; 151(2):233-42. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90803-5. View

16.

Bardo M, Neisewander J . Single-trial conditioned place preference using intravenous morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986; 25(5):1101-5. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90092-4. View

17.

Di Chiara G . The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995; 38(2):95-137. DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01118-i. View

18.

Horvitz J, Ettenberg A . Conditioned incentive properties of a food-paired conditioned stimulus remain intact during dopamine receptor blockade. Behav Neurosci. 1991; 105(4):536-41. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.105.4.536. View

19.

Bardo M, Gehrke B, Shortridge B, Rauhut A . Effects of beta-funaltrexamine and naloxonazine on single-trial morphine-conditioned place preference and locomotor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003; 74(3):617-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)01049-3. View

20.

Shippenberg T, Huber A, Herz A . Neuroanatomical substrates mediating the aversive effects of D-1 dopamine receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991; 103(2):209-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02244205. View